Hi Holger,
> try more context. hint: it's a response to what *you* wrote.
Well, it seems we both have no idea if some of mutt devs are paid or
not, so let's move to the next point :).
> obviously.
> i'll point out that we were talking about the motivation to polish
> patches.
> so how exactly ca
Hi Holger,
you're entirely right with my misuse of 'high-quality'. I should have
quoted it. The submitter himself would be responsible for the quality.
The point of this suggestion is that patches would be incorporated
faster, but on the other hand they could be much faster abandoned
(because the
