#3580: mutt -H $draft ignores recipient arguments on CLI
--+--
Reporter: adam.spiers | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone: 1.6
Component: mutt |Version: 1.5.21
Reso
[The trac to mutt-dev gateway was down, so I'm manually sending my
comment from a couple days ago.]
Adding another patch proposal. This one removes the config options and
the MIME description, making it a simple 2-line patch.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[The trac to mutt-dev gateway was down, so this email didn't get sent
automatically.]
Just a few comments on the proposed patch:
if (draftFile)
+ {
+ENVELOPE *envelope_from_arguments = msg->env;
msg->env = mutt_read_rfc822_header (fin, NULL, 1, 0);
+if (!msg->env)
+
After re-cloning the repository instead of wrestling with hg gremlins,
I am now successfully building with automake-1.11c and autoconf-2.69.
-- Andras Salamon and...@dns.net
* jpac...@redhat.com [2013-10-31 13:20]:
> > But the solution is not to give everyone commit access.
>
> Don't get me wrong, but a high-quality patch in conjunction with
> constructive track ticket seems enough for accepting the person as a
> commiter into (and only into) the quick-moving partly
Hi Holger,
> But the solution is not to give everyone
> commit access.
Don't get me wrong, but a high-quality patch in conjunction with
constructive track ticket seems enough for accepting the person as a
commiter into (and only into) the quick-moving partly stable branch.
It's imho quite far fro
Hi Holger,
> You suggest the project could be moved forward without
> maintainership, while I believe that strong maintainership is the only
> realistic option.
More accurately, I suggest the project could be moved forward by
_adding_ another tier, which would fill in the hole called "missing
pos
