[ANNOUNCE] mutt-1.5.22 is out

2013-10-17 Thread Brendan Cully
This is a bug fix/stability release over 1.5.21, brought to you by the letters me (@sigpipe.org, who wrote the lion's share of the changes for this release and managed getting this release out the door). Thanks again Michael! pgpPFxnONaOXE.pgp Description: PGP signature

mutt: 3 new changesets

2013-10-17 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6320:8c5ea668e7e0 user: Brendan Cully date: Thu Oct 17 22:43:05 2013 -0700 link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/8c5ea668e7e0 automatic post-release commit for mutt-1.5.22 changeset: 6321:941ba77040a8 user: Brendan Cully date: Thu Oct 17 22:43:06 2013 -0700 l

Re: The future of mutt... - intermediate aggregation

2013-10-17 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:29:49AM +0200, jpac...@redhat.com wrote: > On 10/07/2013 10:29 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > mutt already has that anything-goes branch: it's called trac. when > > you make an actual hg branch of it, it will be a fork, and master > > will be abandoned for good. > > W

[Mutt] #3655: download.html contains bad links / needs updating

2013-10-17 Thread Mutt
#3655: download.html contains bad links / needs updating -+-- Reporter: MichaelRay | Owner: mutt-dev Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: trivial | Milestone: Component: doc |Version: Keywords: bad links

Re: [Mutt] #1452: wish rename attachment in compose menu

2013-10-17 Thread Mutt
#1452: wish rename attachment in compose menu -+-- Reporter: David Laight | Owner: mutt-dev Type: enhancement | Status: reopened Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: mutt

Re: [Mutt] #1452: wish rename attachment in compose menu

2013-10-17 Thread Mutt
#1452: wish rename attachment in compose menu -+-- Reporter: David Laight | Owner: mutt-dev Type: enhancement | Status: reopened Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: mutt

Re: The future of mutt... - intermediate aggregation

2013-10-17 Thread jpac...@redhat.com
Hi Oswald, On 10/07/2013 10:29 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > the difference is that these branches are maintained by the same people, > or at least that those maintaining the stable branch are *paid* to > actively cherry-pick from the unstable branch. > you proposed an open-for-all branch with v