Message-ID / Mutt's way to get the FQDN

2013-10-07 Thread Alexander Gattin
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:22:24PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:56:13AM +0300, > Alexander Gattin wrote: > > In my opinion `hostname` in the kernel is just > > a hint. > > Well, I mean seriously, if you're going to tell > me that a required part of configuring > network

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-07 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:56:13AM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 02:19:11PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > I'm not going to imagine that because it's a requirement of > > TCP/IP. All machines have a hostname. > > In my opinion `hostname` in the kernel is just a hint.

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-07 Thread Will Fiveash
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:06:35PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:06:29PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: > > MUA may choose to operate offline, so some hacks around libresolv > > (like reading /etc/resolv.conf) are OK instead of just returning -1: > > NO, THEY ARE NOT. If

Re: Problems in mutt.1, muttrc.5

2013-10-07 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Michael Elkins : > Applied. Thanks. I'm a mutt user myself. -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond

mutt: add missing files that were supposed to be included with [...

2013-10-07 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6315:804e46bc366e user: Michael Elkins date: Mon Oct 07 17:32:11 2013 + link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/804e46bc366e add missing files that were supposed to be included with [76f8df0ac80396559aa80e7f145be6f235a6db51] diffs (112 lines): diff -r 76f8df0ac803 -

Re: [Mutt] #3643: Man pages for pgpewrap and pgpring and other doc fixes

2013-10-07 Thread Mutt
#3643: Man pages for pgpewrap and pgpring and other doc fixes --+-- Reporter: hhorak | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: trivial | Milestone: Component: doc |Version: Resolution: fixed| Key

mutt: adds some missing options in doc and adds man pages for bi...

2013-10-07 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6314:76f8df0ac803 user: hho...@redhat.com date: Mon Oct 07 17:21:38 2013 + link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/76f8df0ac803 adds some missing options in doc and adds man pages for binaries pgpewrap and pgpring. closes #3643 diffs (75 lines): diff -r 8d888e4d4f0b

Re: Problems in mutt.1, muttrc.5

2013-10-07 Thread Michael Elkins
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:14:05AM -0400, e...@thyrsus.com wrote: This is automatically generated email about markup problems in a man page for which you appear to be responsible. If you are not the right person or list, please tell me so I can correct my database. See http://catb.org/~esr/docl

mutt: 2 new changesets

2013-10-07 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6312:02234de89d2a user: e...@thyrsus.com date: Mon Oct 07 16:10:00 2013 + link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/02234de89d2a Problems with mutt.1: Ambiguous or invalid backslash. This doesn't cause groff a problem. but it confuses doclifter and may confuse older tro

Re: The future of mutt... - intermediate aggregation

2013-10-07 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:59:32AM +0200, jpac...@redhat.com wrote: > >> Let me propose a fairly minor change in the development process. > >> > > you are proposing a fork on mutt's own infrastructure. > > Not at all. Look at many other projects. Even huge projects like Fedora > ("not guaranteed t

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-07 Thread Alexander Gattin
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 02:19:11PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:01:05PM -0700, > Alexander Gattin wrote: > > You have several hostnames or A records or > > domain names or whatever. Then you have > > `hostname`, which is configured in kernel, at > > least in Linux (cat >

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-07 Thread Alexander Gattin
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 02:15:02PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > The patch is ideal, where the ideal which it > conforms to must be that it programmatically > determines the domain of the machine correctly > in all circumstances where that is possible, and > NEVER produces a result which is invalid

Re: The future of mutt... - intermediate aggregation

2013-10-07 Thread jpac...@redhat.com
Hi, >> Let me propose a fairly minor change in the development process. >> > you are proposing a fork on mutt's own infrastructure. Not at all. Look at many other projects. Even huge projects like Fedora ("not guaranteed to work in a production environment") and RHEL ("everything bundled is guara