Re: [Mutt] #3644: segmentation fault when viewing an application/x-sh attachment

2013-10-04 Thread Mutt
#3644: segmentation fault when viewing an application/x-sh attachment ---+-- Reporter: vinc17| Owner: me Type: defect| Status: assigned Priority: critical | Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: Resolution:

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-04 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Yes I am but I need imap.would be better off starting over with python.what stops me every time is the need for a windows edit control.it shouldn't take more than 2 days effort for some one knowledge in rich edit controls.it is taking me forever to climb this learning curve. Sent from my Virgin

Re: [Mutt] #3653: Fcc empty on postponed emails

2013-10-04 Thread Mutt
#3653: Fcc empty on postponed emails -+-- Reporter: muttbug111 | Owner: me Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Component: mutt|Version: 1.5.21 Resolution: | Keywor

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-04 Thread Richard
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:18:37AM -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > > What I'm proposing is fairly radical and in order for it to become > part of a bigger system, we would need to prove the concept. Proving > the concept means trying it out in small such as part of a mutt > reworking/re-factori

mutt: fix more comment typos

2013-10-04 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6307:0beba37c336b user: Michael Elkins date: Fri Oct 04 16:47:59 2013 + link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/0beba37c336b fix more comment typos diffs (59 lines): diff -r bc7e7cf0fed3 -r 0beba37c336b crypt-gpgme.c --- a/crypt-gpgme.c Tue Jul 23 14:07:04 2013 +

Re: mutt: 2 new changesets

2013-10-04 Thread Andras Salamon
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:36:06PM +, Michael Elkins wrote: I you want to produce a patch which reverts those specific instances, I will apply it. It wasn't worth the effort to edit out those specific parts of the patch. To avoid typo en-GB/en-US typo wars, let's leave it. -- Andras Sala

Re: mutt: 2 new changesets

2013-10-04 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:33:56PM +0100, Andras Salamon wrote: It would be useful if a typo-fix changeset didn't change perfectly valid words for other equivalent words. "Initialise" and "behaviour" are perfectly valid English words, even if the dictionary of the person doing the proofreading f

Re: mutt: 2 new changesets

2013-10-04 Thread Andras Salamon
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:53:49AM -0700, Brendan Cully communicated: changeset: 6306:bc7e7cf0fed3 user: Ondřej Bílka It would be useful if a typo-fix changeset didn't change perfectly valid words for other equivalent words. "Initialise" and "behaviour" are perfectly valid English words,

[PATCH] When recalling a postponed message that does not have a x-mutt-fcc header

2013-10-04 Thread Michael Elkins
mutt.h | 1 + postpone.c | 6 ++ send.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) # HG changeset patch # User Michael Elkins # Date 1380910935 0 # Branch HEAD # Node ID 5654fb98d7ab4d6b581963e21ad2ef36f6d85f4a # Parent 04c0cf885460b4a26a4743c45a1bd7f2847c7e91 When

Re: [Mutt] #3653: Fcc empty on postponed emails

2013-10-04 Thread Mutt
#3653: Fcc empty on postponed emails -+-- Reporter: muttbug111 | Owner: me Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Component: mutt|Version: 1.5.21 Resolution: | Keywor

[PATCH] Display the KeyID when the pubkey is not found in the user's keyring during signature verification

2013-10-04 Thread Michael Elkins
crypt-gpgme.c | 65 +++--- 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) # HG changeset patch # User Michael Elkins # Date 1380909842 0 # Branch HEAD # Node ID 04c0cf885460b4a26a4743c45a1bd7f2847c7e91 # Parent a0f5390e89d12f30ebff4db82b

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-04 Thread Derek Martin
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:06:29PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:16:19PM -0500, Derek > Martin wrote: > > What, you want a counter example? > > Yes, > > > http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3298 > > This one is a miss. Sorry, you're wrong. Even if the patch was com

[Mutt] #3654: error message is not useful when verifying a pgp signature when the pubkey is missing

2013-10-04 Thread Mutt
#3654: error message is not useful when verifying a pgp signature when the pubkey is missing +-- Reporter: me | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: crypto |Version: 1.5.21 K

Re: [Mutt] #3644: segmentation fault when viewing an application/x-sh attachment

2013-10-04 Thread Mutt
#3644: segmentation fault when viewing an application/x-sh attachment ---+-- Reporter: vinc17| Owner: me Type: defect| Status: assigned Priority: critical | Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: Resolution:

Re: [PATCH] Fix typos.

2013-10-04 Thread Michael Elkins
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:07:04PM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote: Then I used styleppp_fix_spell script to fix occurences of typos above in comments. I've applied your patch, thanks! http://dev.mutt.org/trac/changeset/bc7e7cf0fed3/

mutt: 2 new changesets

2013-10-04 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6306:bc7e7cf0fed3 user: Ondřej Bílka date: Tue Jul 23 14:07:04 2013 +0200 link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/bc7e7cf0fed3 fix typos in comments changeset: 6307:0beba37c336b user: Michael Elkins date: Fri Oct 04 16:47:59 2013 + link: http://dev.mut

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-04 Thread Eric S. Johansson
On 10/3/2013 6:49 PM, Will Fiveash wrote: That is unfortunate for sure. Isn't Accessibility a general issue for many disabled Unix/Linux users? The reason I ask is to pin down whether it's mutt that needs Accessibility improvements or is it the platform that mutt runs on. Accessibility is an

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-04 Thread Alexander Gattin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:53:11PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:22:00AM +0300, > Alexander Gattin wrote: > > I use / ~b for searching in IMAP > > folder. Newer IMAP versions support > > server-side searching but AFAIK mutt doesn't > > support this (XXX: one more wishlist

Re: The future of mutt...

2013-10-04 Thread Alexander Gattin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:16:19PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > What, you want a counter example? Yes, > http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3298 This one is a miss. > - Had a working patch 4 years ago. I don't like some parts of your original patch too, by the way. mutt is not an MTA but MUA

Re: The future of mutt... - intermediate aggregation

2013-10-04 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:40:12PM +0200, jpac...@redhat.com wrote: > Let me propose a fairly minor change in the development process. > you are proposing a fork on mutt's own infrastructure. i'm not quite sure whether you are incredibly naive or incredibly sneaky. ;) nope, what it takes to make a