Re: the mutt development vacuum

2013-04-05 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Brendan Cully wrote: > On Thursday, 04 April 2013 at 13:13, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > On a different note, as a newcomer this reception is quite demotivating. > > Even a (polite) quick email rejecting the patch is better than dead > > silence. The development community doesn't appear especially

the mutt development vacuum

2013-04-05 Thread Brendan Cully
On Thursday, 04 April 2013 at 13:13, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On a different note, as a newcomer this reception is quite demotivating. > Even a (polite) quick email rejecting the patch is better than dead > silence. The development community doesn't appear especially vibrant. > A more friendly a

Re: [PATCH 0 of 6] Add crypt_opportunistic_encrypt option

2013-04-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:29:20AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:48:15PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:13:36PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > On a different note, as a newcomer this reception is quite demotivating. > > > Even a (polite) q

Re: [PATCH 0 of 6] Add crypt_opportunistic_encrypt option

2013-04-05 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:48:15PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:13:36PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > On a different note, as a newcomer this reception is quite demotivating. > > Even a (polite) quick email rejecting the patch is better than dead > > silence. The d