On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:08:58PM -0700, Mun Johl wrote:
>
> I'm trying to find out what else I need to modify in the header so that
> mutt can function properly.
I think you also want to look at least at References: or In-Reply-To:
(and sometimes Message-Id:). These are the only headers related
Hi,
I'm running Mutt 1.5.20 on Red Hat 5.3 and I'm trying to understand how
Mutt ascertains how to represent e-mails in the threaded view within the
Index.
Here's my issue: I forward Outlook e-mails to my Linux box (IMAP/POP are
not supported--don't get me started). When Outlook does the forward
Hi,
* Antonio Radici wrote:
> ok, so I probably come across a different issue and what is in hg is
> fixing it, now I have to find the right commit to backport =)
Just follow the daily logs sent to mutt-dev or subscribe to the rss feed
or use whatever else you prefer. There're actually two issue
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:59:04AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/NewMailHandling
>
> This page contains information about things to do, status and
> solutions. The issue is been worked on and thought about, but nothing
> big enough to mention on that site yet. I t
Hi,
* Antonio Radici wrote:
> So I was wondering what is the status of the mail handling in the hg
> repository
> and if I could start to backport it to 1.5.20; is it complete? How far is it
> from being completed? What is left?
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki/NewMailHandling
This page contains
Hi,
* Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> So, this was not a valid search pattern? I should have used
> "~b somestring\="? That seems to give me a lot of false positives (to
> be confirmed).
Yes you have to because = is a denotes a pattern just like ~ does,
except that all ~ patterns works on regex and = o
