On 2008-11-10, Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 10 November 2008 at 09:01, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > On Monday, November 10 at 11:42 PM, quoth TAKAHASHI Tamotsu:
> >> This has already been fixed:
> >>
> >> 1970-01-01 00:00 + Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (a2e8f6fab8d3)
oops. I'll fix that tonight.
On Monday, 10 November 2008 at 09:01, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Monday, November 10 at 11:42 PM, quoth TAKAHASHI Tamotsu:
>> This has already been fixed:
>>
>> 1970-01-01 00:00 + Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (a2e8f6fab8d3)
>>
>>* smtp.c: Test that env
On Monday, November 10 at 11:42 PM, quoth TAKAHASHI Tamotsu:
This has already been fixed:
1970-01-01 00:00 + Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (a2e8f6fab8d3)
* smtp.c: Test that envelope from or from is set before attempting
SMTP delivery. Closes #3079.
Oh wait, since over
Hi folks,
Lisa Dusseault has started spec work on using HTTP and Atom to access
e-mail stores:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dusseault-httpmail-00
From a quick look at that I-D, it should be a fairly easy job to
implement this as a mailbox driver for mutt, probably relying on
extern
On Monday, 10 November 2008 at 08:57, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Monday, November 10 at 11:42 PM, quoth TAKAHASHI Tamotsu:
>> This has already been fixed:
>>
>> 1970-01-01 00:00 + Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (a2e8f6fab8d3)
>>
>>* smtp.c: Test that envelope from or from is set befo
On 2008-11-10, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, November 10 at 12:15 AM, quoth Gary Johnson:
>> $ echo test | mutt -s test garyjohn
>
> Hmmm, okay, so, you're not *specifying* a return address. I suppose the
> question is: what should mutt be doing in this case?
>
> Have you
On Monday, November 10 at 08:55 AM, quoth Gary Johnson:
I don't explicitly specify a from address when I use that same mutt
binary interactively, as I'm doing now, and it sends mail fine
interactively.
I tried the following three methods of specifying my from address.
Yikes! All three of tho
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:53:45AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> I think sendmail probably defaults to $USER @ $HOSTNAME
That's basically right, though what exactly is meant by $HOSTNAME is
up for debate (settled by how the system's sendmail is configured).
If it matters to anyone paying attentiont
On Monday, November 10 at 11:42 PM, quoth TAKAHASHI Tamotsu:
This has already been fixed:
1970-01-01 00:00 + Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (a2e8f6fab8d3)
* smtp.c: Test that envelope from or from is set before attempting
SMTP delivery. Closes #3079.
Oh wait, since over
On Monday, November 10 at 12:15 AM, quoth Gary Johnson:
$ echo test | mutt -s test garyjohn
Hmmm, okay, so, you're not *specifying* a return address. I suppose
the question is: what should mutt be doing in this case?
Have you set the environment variable 'EMAIL'? I'm guessing not. I'm
als
* Mon Nov 10 2008 Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> but when I try to pipe a message to mutt's stdin, I get a
> segmentation fault, e.g.,
>
>$ echo test | mutt -s test garyjohn
(snip)
>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>0x080b1f1b in mutt_smtp_send (from=0x0, to=0x
I haven't had time to make much progress on this, but I thought I'd
present what I've found so far in case someone else might have found
the same thing.
I've used mutt for years on Unix systems with sendmail. Now I'm
having to use a system without a properly configured sendmail so I'm
trying
12 matches
Mail list logo
