Re: [PATCH] fix indent_string handling with format=flowed

Hi again, On Mon, Oct 15, 2007, Rocco Rutte wrote: > * Johannes Stezenbach [07-10-14 21:54:36 +0200] wrote: >> At the moment, with $text_flowed set, replies to non-flowed mails >> get ugly quoting with '>' instead of '> '. Mutt _displays_ such >> quoting as '> ', but to people with other MUAs it m

Re: [PATCH] fix indent_string handling with format=flowed

Hi, damn, this stuff is so subtle it's really hard for me to find words to express myself without creating misunderstandings. Maybe I should state my goals before we go into details: - I want mutt to follow RFC 3676 by the book (currently I think it doesn't) - and I want a mode where I can disa

Re: [PATCH] fix indent_string handling with format=flowed

Hi, On Mon, Oct 15, 2007, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Ah, now I see your point. I fixed this in changeset 35e5c34b7e91 which also > fixes bug #2917. Thanks! It seems things get fixed in no time if we can agree on the problem :-) Johannes

Re: [PATCH] fix indent_string handling with format=flowed

Hi, * Johannes Stezenbach [07-10-14 21:54:36 +0200] wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2007, Rocco Rutte wrote: * Johannes Stezenbach [07-10-12 23:14:21 +0200] wrote: I still think that my patch does the right thing. I think I see a problem with it. It removes the space between quotes and text in the

Re: [PATCH] fix indent_string handling with format=flowed

Hi, * Johannes Stezenbach [07-10-14 21:12:59 +0200] wrote: * Johannes Stezenbach [07-10-12 23:14:21 +0200] wrote: I think it would be useful to have a config option to disable RFC 3676 handling of received messages altogether and make mutt behave like a plain old non-f=f aware MUA. Mutt wit

Re: [PATCH] fix indent_string handling with format=flowed

Hi, * Johannes Stezenbach [07-10-14 20:33:21 +0200] wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2007, Rocco Rutte wrote: * Johannes Stezenbach [07-10-12 23:14:21 +0200] wrote: Just as I write this I notice another thing which might be a bug: According to RFC 3676 "4.1. Interpreting Format=Flowed": A seri

Re: [Mutt] #2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there

#2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there are single byte Comment (by pdmef): mutt_FormatString() is now supposed to be mostly multibyte-safe, including padding with multibyte characters. Can you please report if you still have problems? Otherwise I'd like to close this ticket. -

Re: [Mutt] #2917: fixed sections of format=flowed messages can wrap

#2917: fixed sections of format=flowed messages can wrap prematurely (78 cols) Changes (by pdmef): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: (In [35e5c34b7e91]) f=f: Print standalone fixed lines as-is (closes #2917). -- Ticket URL: