Hi,
* Marco d'Itri [07-09-01 11:58:56 +0200] wrote:
On Aug 31, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. I wonder, though, whether it might be
useful to move the subwindow toward the bottom of the screen, to
basically grow out of the status bar / entry line. I'd su
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:08:08AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > I'm in no way suggesting that the GUI interface should/could
> > replace the terminal-oriented interface... just that both are
> > often quite useful. I'm also aware that mutt can do formatting
> > of rtf messages, but that requi
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:08:08AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2007-09-02 00:44:15 -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
>
> > This, on the other hand, seems kind of yucky to me... not because
> > there's anything inherently bad about it, but just because it
> > breaks with long-standing UI design pra
Hi,
the attached patch adds a 'show' keyword to display certain runtime
information in paged menus.
Currently implemented are:
1) 'show attachments' to show current attachment configs (replaces
'attachments ?' which is kept for compatibility)
2) 'show config [regex]' to display all mutt op
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> 1) mutt_multi_choice() is currently used to let the user choose from quite
> a number of possible options. To fit in 80x25 they're abbreviated which
That looks nice. ;-)
> 2) When interactively entering 'attachments ?' it'll end cu
On 2007-09-02 15:08:10 +0200, Vladimír Marek wrote:
>> Tag the messages you want to reply. Then "; r" and you have
>> them all in your editor ;)
> That's insane :) It would never cross my mind that you can tag-reply.
Nah... tag-replying is a totally essential feature. :)
--
Thomas Roessler
> I don't think that was meant. What was meant (I think) was this: when
> writing some reply to a message in a thread, you want to re-read a part
> of it and possibly refer to another message ala "foo wrote this" or "bar
> wrote that".
>
> If you have the editor in a different window and mutt s
> > JUst out of curiosity, how do you compose message out of different
> > mails ? For example you reply to someone, but need to include part
> > of another mail you got the day before.
[...]
> > I'm just wondering if someone is using some trick or something
> > more user friendly.
>
> Tag the mes
Hi,
the attached patch adds mutt_multi_choice_dlg() for getting a choice out
of multiple via a dialog rather than a prompt in the status line.
Some notes about it:
1) I'm not a curses export and this patch is untested for slang.
2) For now it uses the status color which probably should be ch
Hi,
* Derek Martin [07-09-02 00:44:15 -0400] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
1) mutt_multi_choice() is currently used to let the user choose from
quite a number of possible options. To fit in 80x25 they're abbreviated
which obviously doesn't look nice. I've
Hi,
* Vladimír Marek [07-09-02 11:34:50 +0200] wrote:
JUst out of curiosity, how do you compose message out of different mails
? For example you reply to someone, but need to include part of another
mail you got the day before.
I don't think that was meant. What was meant (I think) was this:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Derek Martin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
1) mutt_multi_choice() is currently used to let the user choose from
quite a number of possible options. To fit in 80x25 they're abbreviated
which obviously doesn't look nice. I've put together
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 the mental interface of
Vladimír Marek told:
> [...]
[...]
> JUst out of curiosity, how do you compose message out of different
> mails ? For example you reply to someone, but need to include part
> of another mail you got the day before.
>
> The way I'm using is to do normal
[...]
> > FWIW, I've also always wanted Mutt to have a multi-paned interface,
> > not unlike most GUI mailers: one pane for the folder list, one for the
> > message index, and one to display messages.
>
> Incidentally, I wouldn't want to have that particular kind of UI for
> myself. The current
On 2007-09-02 00:44:15 -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> This, on the other hand, seems kind of yucky to me... not because
> there's anything inherently bad about it, but just because it
> breaks with long-standing UI design practices. Dialog boxes
> generally go in the middle of the main window, and
15 matches
Mail list logo
