* Thu Mar 8 2007 Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> - Forwarded message from Jö Fahlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> Core Securities advisory:
> http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item&id=1687
>
> Announcement on the GnuPG mailinglist:
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2007q1
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:37:47 -0700
On Thursday, March 8 at 02:53
On Thursday, March 8 at 02:53 PM, quoth David Champion:
Anyway, you seem to be assuming that Mirapoint's server does not
support QUOTA or ACL before login, but I'm not sure why that
assumption is valid.
Well, there's a couple reasons. The most obvious is that ACL commands
are only allowed in
Re: To Mutt Developers 2007-03-08 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->mutt-dev
> Responsible-Changed-By: cb
Sorry I messed up...
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
--- Begin Message ---
Forwarding #413688 here as well...
The attached mbox is availa
Synopsis: GnuPG and GnuPG clients unsigned data injection vulnerability
Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->mutt-dev
Responsible-Changed-By: cb
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:21:33 +0100
Responsible-Changed-Why:
and fixing responsibility...
Comment added by cb on T
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:41:23 -0600
* On 2007.03.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
*
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:10:00 -0700
On Thursday, March 8 at 08:35
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:53:38 -0600
* On 2007.03.08, in <[EMAIL
* On 2007.03.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Kyle Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, March 8 at 01:17 PM, quoth David Champion:
> >>This is, well, stupid. Not only do they claim ACL support, but
> >>QUOTA support as well.
> >
> >I'm not sure I understand you. I surely don't
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:40:14AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> However, I'm not sure how IMAP servers (UW and dovecot) actually use
> the keywords. Would having mutt handle this header interfere with
> that function?
>
now, that's an interesting question ...
uw-imap translates keywords into me
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:42:40 -0700
On Thursday, March 8 at 01:17
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:17:38 -0600
* On 2007.03.08, in <[EMAIL
On Thursday, March 8 at 08:35 PM, quoth Christoph Berg:
Still, other MUAs probably gracefully accept that broken behavior,
maybe mutt should as well?
Probably should... particularly given that it seems to be viewed as
"okay" (even in the various IMAP RFC's) for the CAPABILITY response to
cha
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:21:38 +0100
Re: Kyle Wheeler 2007-03-08 <[EMAIL PROTECTED
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:19:45 -0800
On Thursday, 08 March 2007 a
On Thursday, March 8 at 01:17 PM, quoth David Champion:
This is, well, stupid. Not only do they claim ACL support, but
QUOTA support as well.
I'm not sure I understand you. I surely don't mean to defend Mirapoint
(we use them, and I'm not a fan by a long shot) but it is legitimate
to offer
The following reply was made to PR imap/2837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: imap/2837: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY
3.5.8-GR server
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:11:20 -0700
On Thur
On Thursday, 08 March 2007 at 12:11, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Thursday, March 8 at 07:25 PM, quoth Christoph Berg:
> >I think the fact that MYRIGHTS is not understood by the imap server I
> >connect to causes mutt to think my folders are read-only.
> For what it's worth, in this case, the IMAP se
* On 2007.03.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Kyle Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 ACL QUOTA LITERAL+ NAMESPACE UIDPLUS
> >
> >After (note there is no ACL capability here):
> >
> >CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 IDLE LOGIN-REFERRALS MAILBOX-REFERRALS
> >NAMESPAC
On Thursday, March 8 at 07:25 PM, quoth Christoph Berg:
I think the fact that MYRIGHTS is not understood by the imap server I
connect to causes mutt to think my folders are read-only.
For what it's worth, in this case, the IMAP server is broken. What
causes mutt to think that it can use the M
>Number: 2837
>Category: imap
>Synopsis: MYRIGHTS not understood by Mirapoint IMAP4PROXY 3.5.8-GR server
>Confidential: no
>Severity: normal
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:
Hello Christoph!
On Wednesday, March 7, 2007 at 13:36:05 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> 1. Filing bugs using the mail interface [...] Try to avoid MIME mail,
> gnats will destroy it (any attachment, pgp signatures, etc.)
Some time ago I tried mail reporting, but abandoned: Every time the
re
* On 2007.03.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Oswald Buddenhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:19:50AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > I guess as long as I'm knee-deep in pitching patches, xlabel_ext might
> > be nice to see as well. This it the extension to x-label
Hi,
I finally managed to get hg2git[1] working fast and properly (or at
least good enough for now) to import mutt hg trees into git (if anyone
wants to play with it: the initial import takes roughly 10 minutes on my
relatively slow hardware). I've rebuild my tree based on that[2] and
rewrote
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:19:50AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> I guess as long as I'm knee-deep in pitching patches, xlabel_ext might
> be nice to see as well. This it the extension to x-label that allows
> setting labels and sorting by label internally to mutt.
>
hmm, this looks about the sam
2 new changesets in mutt:
http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/5de130a3cb96
changeset: 4965:5de130a3cb96
branch: HEAD
tag: tip
user:Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
date:Wed Mar 07 12:18:34 2007 -0800
summary: Typos in muttrc.man.head
http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/re
26 matches
Mail list logo
