On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:21:01AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> * The trash_folder patch.
I really like this patch, and think it would be a useful feature. I know
there has been reluctance to include it in the past, but just my $0.02.
w
On 23Feb2007 00:04, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Re: Kyle Wheeler 2007-02-22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Well, I think a valid set of patches to examine are the ones that
| > Debian applies. They've got a good list, and their patches are also
| > pretty well tested. The ones that I rea
On 2007-02-22 09:30:33 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and which patches peop
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:30:33AM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and which
I'm not sure what subtle ways are that cause grief, but I like the sidebar
patch. In addition, I recommend the xtitles patch:
patch-1.2.nt.xtitles.1.txt
Other patches I use are
patch-1.5.0.ats.date_conditional.1
dgc.deepif.1
patch-1.5.0.ats.date_conditional.1
mutt-1.5.8-indexcolor-3
And one I h
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
Brendan Cully told:
> On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 23:02, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
> > Brendan Cully told:
> >
> > > I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> > > proper
Re: Kyle Wheeler 2007-02-22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well, I think a valid set of patches to examine are the ones that
> Debian applies. They've got a good list, and their patches are also
> pretty well tested. The ones that I really appreciate are the
> compressed-folders patch and the xtitles pat
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 23:02, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
> Brendan Cully told:
>
> > I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> > proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> > 1.5.15. So, I'd like
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
Brendan Cully told:
> I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and whic
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:57:22AM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I'd be very interested in these new bzr vs hg benchmarks. Every test
> I've seen up until now, hg has trounced bzr performance-wise. (And hg
> does renames.)
I don't have benchmarks; I'm going purely subjectively here. No pretence
Re: Elimar Riesebieter 2007-02-22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://greek0.net/patches/mutt-1.5.12-indexcolor-3+cb.diff
> Update for 1.5.13 get from debian repo
Fyi, that's here:
http://www.df7cb.de/projects/mutt/indexcolor/patch-1.5.13.greek0.indexcolor-3+cb
(What's actually in the Debian package in
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
Brendan Cully told:
> I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and whic
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:57:22AM -0800 I heard the voice of
Brendan Cully, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I'd be very interested in these new bzr vs hg benchmarks. Every test
> I've seen up until now, hg has trounced bzr performance-wise.
I'm a bzr-ite, and I'm not aware that there are any. I'm su
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 18:12, Paul Walker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:20:06AM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
>
> > I am probably biased, since I do a fair amount of hg hacking, but it
> > is certainly an improvement over CVS.
>
> Out of interest, have you looked at bzr? I was using
* Feb 22 18:31 Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> assumed-charset might be a good idea too.
Would love to see this one.
--
Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://johan.svedberg.com/
pgp121laYjlTt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:30:33AM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would like to
> see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
I'd really like to see a sane version of the "stuff_all_quoted" patch
that everyone's relatively happy with.
Th
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:20:06AM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I am probably biased, since I do a fair amount of hg hacking, but it
> is certainly an improvement over CVS.
Out of interest, have you looked at bzr? I was using Mercurial at one point,
but left it for bzr quite some time ago, and h
On Thursday, February 22 at 09:30 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would like to
see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
Ooo! Wishlist time!
Well, I think a valid set of patches to examine are the ones that
Debian applies. They've got a
=- Brendan Cully wrote on Thu 22.Feb'07 at 9:30:33 -0800 -=
> On my list at the moment:
> I'll probably apply my ESMTP patch (*dons flame suit*)
> And I think the configurable umask patch is handy.
A FAQ is "attach_dir" for where attachments should be saved.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YO
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:20:06AM -0800 I heard the voice of
Brendan Cully, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 09:11, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > I understand he has some plans, including moving the master
> > repository from cvs to mercurial.
>
> Indeed. I think it offers a
On 2007-02-22 09:30:33 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I'll probably apply my ESMTP patch (*dons flame suit*)
*activates flame thrower*
(But up to you.)
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
like to see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
On my list at the moment:
I'll probably app
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 09:11, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Brendan is taking the lead for releasing things and deciding what
> gets into the repository. I understand he has some plans, including
> moving the master repository from cvs to mercurial.
Indeed. I think it offers a nu
Hi Thomas,
> Thanks to Brendan for taking over, and thanks to all of you for
> making mutt the mailer that I still prefer to use! ;-)
Just wanted to join you in thanking Brendan, and also to say thanks to you
for your work over the years. It's been much appreciated; hope you enjoy
whatever else n
hi all,
i have made a small patch which allows mutt reading mailbox in threading mode
to flag thread as "persistently" deleted, which means that any new message
comming to such a thread is automatically tagged as deleted (this persistence
has of course only duration of one mutt session:).
its qu
Re: Thomas Roessler 2007-02-22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks to Brendan for taking over, and thanks to all of you for
> making mutt the mailer that I still prefer to use! ;-)
Hi Thomas,
thanks to you as well for all the work done!
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature
Folks,
Brendan is taking the lead for releasing things and deciding what
gets into the repository. I understand he has some plans, including
moving the master repository from cvs to mercurial.
I'm out of the critical path, but will stick around.
To sign future releases, Brendan will likely use
27 matches
Mail list logo
