3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org] On Behalf Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez
> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM
> To: MP3 encoders development list
> Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the
> resultingfile
>
> OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if
Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez
> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM
> To: MP3 encoders development list
> Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the
> resultingfile
>
> OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if you encounter some
> other po
-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org
[mailto:mp3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org] On Behalf Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM
To: MP3 encoders development list
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the resultingfile
OK, I was already doing in that way usin
OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if you encounter some
other posibility I'll be waiting.
Thank you very much.
Joaquín
2009/8/3 Hans Meine
> Hi again!
>
> On Monday 03 August 2009 14:32:13 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote:
> > Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me
Hi again!
On Monday 03 August 2009 14:32:13 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote:
> Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes
> aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav
> files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Joaquin Dario
Gonzalez wrote:
> Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes
> aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav
> files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in just
> one mp
Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes
aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav
files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in just
one mp3 file. More files concatenated, more the total time error I have. I
t
hola usted esta equivocado, no tengo nada que ver con esto !!
Hi everybody. I'm using lame to convert a wav file whit a duration of
exactly 1.000 (one) second. The resulting mp3 last 1.045 seconds.
I need an mp3 file whit the exactly same duration of the wav file. I'm just
using the simple con
Hi!
On Monday 03 August 2009 09:16:28 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi everybody. I'm using lame to convert a wav file whit a duration of
> exactly 1.000 (one) second. The resulting mp3 last 1.045 seconds.
> I need an mp3 file whit the exactly same duration of the wav file. I'm just
> using the
sathish wrote:
> Is this what you want me to have a look at.
>
Yes, that would be great. Hopefully it will be something obvious.
Adam
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Hello Adam,
Is this what you want me to have a look at.
Hoping to hear from you soon.
kk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Heinz
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 11:58 PM
To: mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame --decode
Hello Adam,
Sorry for the delay in the reply. I am travelling and have irregular access
to the mails. I will get back to you and update you on the same as soon as
I am back in office.
Sorry for the inconvenience caused to you.
Have a great Day
Krishna Kumar (KK)
Sr Manager Business Developmen
ah-thanks!
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:19:19 -0500
"Rick H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marty,
A Google search shows that Lame won't do this. Something called LAME4 may.
*However*
Google mp3 tag editor command line
One program is here:
http://ostermiller.org/mp3tagger/
You can do a bulk extract o
Marty,
A Google search shows that Lame won't do this. Something called LAME4 may.
*However*
Google mp3 tag editor command line
One program is here:
http://ostermiller.org/mp3tagger/
You can do a bulk extract of the mp3 tags and then do a bulk restore after
you recompress with lame.
Good luck
So I take it you are doing this for a hardware player? If so, just get
one with a big HDD and load it up with .WAV files. I think there is at
least one or two players out there that can play FLAC as well.
Chris
Richard wrote:
> I not interested in saving space... just to get the best recordi
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 6:59 pm, Alexander Strange wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Richard wrote:
> > would this be the best for sound quality
> >
> > -q 0 -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
> >
> > or
> >
> > -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
>
> Theoretically, -q0, but as nobody ever uses that
I did that test, before using my Mac, (now running linux)
and I was the one whom pick abx test 20 plus time correct between the two
joint stereo and no joint... also, that was with lame 3.9.2 or 3.9.5? it was
last year..
but could always pick the artifact that there was a hot spot in mids.,
comp
On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Richard wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply...
>
> on -m s is full stereo what happen to normal stereo ?
> don't want joint stereo... bad idea
>
> I know you going to say its great, but its not.
> case in point take white rabbit song recorded by Jefferson Airplane
>
Thanks for the quick reply...
on -m s is full stereo what happen to normal stereo ?
don't want joint stereo... bad idea
I know you going to say its great, but its not.
case in point take white rabbit song recorded by Jefferson Airplane back
in the late 60's ( joint stereo ) kill that song, due to
On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Richard wrote:
>
> isn't -m -s means force stereo (L & R) or normal stereo as recorded ?
-m s forces "full stereo", which is always worse than "joint stereo",
the default.
> and why not -p for error correction ?
Nothing really wrong with it, but where are you exp
On Nov 8, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Richard wrote:
> would this be the best for sound quality
>
> -q 0 -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
>
> or
>
> -b 320 -p -m s --noreplaygain
Theoretically, -q0, but as nobody ever uses that option you can't be
sure.
That is a very strange combination of options.
Do yo
What version Perl are you running?
I just ran it on my machine and it worked fine.
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.7 built for i486-linux
Hope this helps.
> hmm, i got this error trying to run the perl script:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ./lame.pl
> unknown warnings category 'File::Find'
>
> Did you write a script called /tmp/z with these contents and make it
> executable?
I made a script called z and put it in the /tmp/ directory, with the script
that you gave me, then i set the file permissions to 755.
> > #!/bin/sh
> > > infile=$1
> > > dir=`dirname $infile`
> > > base=`basen
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:01:08AM -0400, Ken wrote:
> I'm getting this error when it try to run your script:
> "find: /tmp/z: No such file or directory"
> and the command I'm running it with, not sure if this is right,
> find /home/www.site.com/members/ -name '*.mp3' -exec /tmp/z {} \;
> thanks a
I often use grep in conjunction with "find" and "xargs". Check out xargs, it
might do exactly what you want or at least some of it.
On 8/4/06, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting this error when it try to run your script:
> "find: /tmp/z: No such file or directory"
>
> and the command I
I'm getting this error when it try to run your script:
"find: /tmp/z: No such file or directory"
and the command I'm running it with, not sure if this is right,
find /home/www.site.com/members/ -name '*.mp3' -exec /tmp/z {} \;
thanks again,
-Ken
On 8/3/06, Warren Toomey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
hmm, i got this error trying to run the perl script:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ./lame.pl
unknown warnings category 'File::Find' at ./lame.pl line 8
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./lame.pl line 8.
so I guess 'File::Find' isn't installed? but i can't remember the commands
to install it, i ha
ah, i've got it, had to initialize cpan first:-P
On 8/4/06, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hmm, i got this error trying to run the perl script:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] home]# ./lame.pl
> unknown warnings category 'File::Find' at ./lame.pl line 8
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./lame.p
awesome! thanks guys!
I'll try that this morning.
cheers,
-Ken
On 8/3/06, Stephen Swinsburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heres the perl equivalent:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
>
> #
> # script to process all mp3 files under a given directory or directories
> #
>
> use File::Find;
> no warnings 'Fil
Heres the perl equivalent:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
#
# script to process all mp3 files under a given directory or directories
#
use File::Find;
no warnings 'File::Find';
#the @array holds the dirs you want to search, you can specify
multiple dirs here or just one,
#uncomment appropriate one
[EMAIL
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 06:29:12PM -0400, Ken wrote:
> such I've added code to re-encode mp3's as they are being uploaded, but all
> for the existing mp3's, is it possible in the Linux shell to use maybe grep
> or something to go though all the folders and re-encode every single mp3 one
> at a time
hmm, i don't really know perl, though i know php/asp/vb very well.
but i thought that maybe i could just use grep to find the files and parse
the names into the lame command line.
On 8/3/06, Stephen Swinsburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
> Probably easiest to write a quick perl script
Hi Ken,
Probably easiest to write a quick perl script to search through the
directories and encode each one it finds with your settings.
Hint: Use the File::Find module and give it the top most directory
and it will recurse through every directory it finds.
Hope this helps!
Steve
On 04/08/
Thomas Orgis a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> While hacking around with mpg123 to get rid of encoder/decoder delay and
> padding I stumbled over lame apparently removing samples when using
> --resample. I assume that this indeed should work (or is it experimental?).
>
> I documented my (days of) work at
>
You should try to encode text files as raw pcm files, because
they lack a wav header ;-) At least this avoid the
complaint about corrupt files. And if your quality setting
is good enought you might be able to decode a somewhat readable
text file.
martin
dipankar das wrote:
> I am reporting a queer
I meant only non-audio headers. Audio headers are still there with
their correspondent Audio frames. I think I already "solved" (patched) this
problem, however, I was trying to make sure I did use a more efficient
method. When I use Lame with reencoding options and -t the program will get
rid of th
Luis,
Not sure if you should remove the headers. How would the frame be played
back without header info?
On 3/12/06, Warren Toomey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:58:40AM -, s niazi wrote:
> > Please Visit:
> > [annoying URL]
>
> That list member will be mode
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:58:40AM -, s niazi wrote:
> Please Visit:
> [annoying URL]
That list member will be moderated in the future.
Apologies for the spam,
Warren
___
mp3encoder mailing list
mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org
http://minnie.
Please Visit:
http://www.diabetics.blogspot.com/
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 Luis Cordova wrote :
>I am doing reencoding of mp3 files to different bitrate and samplerate.
>When I have set option -t I am getting rid of the info tags lame attaches to
>the file by default.
>
>STILL, when I open the file I
Try to check the file by openig it in a hex editor. See if the BOM
characther is present for Unicode.
On 12/31/05, Kyle Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just joined the list, and I sent this email. However, I never received a
> copy, so I'm thinking that I sent it too early and I was not app
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Arromdee)
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame problem
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
> First, the ACM directory in the source distro is bad. ACM is empty and acm
> (lower case) contains the contents, making the Linux compile not work until
> you rename it.
It is
Joe Auty a écrit :
lame --abr 56 -s 22.05 oldfile.wav newfile.mp3
The output indicates that it is ignoring my request to encode at
22.05kHz and is encoding at 24Khz anyway. Is there something wrong with
this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate arguments?
-s is an option to speci
I don't think that LAME will decode a Windows Media file, only WAV
files. You could use several different audio ripping software though
to convert WMA to something else. For instance:
http://www.rogueamoeba.com/audiohijack/
Once the WMA is in WAV or AIFF format, you can use LAME to encode
yo
H.. double hm.
it seems that nobody actually is reading my message I just need a
little tiny help
Subject: help please
Hello there, I just downloaded iTunes-LAME Encoder for Mac and have no
idea how it works.
The only thing I want to do is convert a .wma file to .mp3 or A
Hmmm...
When I run:
lame --abr 56 -s 22.05 oldfile.wav newfile.mp3
The output indicates that it is ignoring my request to encode at
22.05kHz and is encoding at 24Khz anyway. Is there something wrong
with this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate arguments?
On May 12, 2005, at 11
From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:08:39 -0500
> How is Lame 3.93 different than 3.96.1? Am I stuck using this much
> older version of Lame, or is there a fix with the new version?
LAME3.93 uses 22.05kHz as sa
They can. The RIFF format,which is what a .wav file is, has them but few
vendors support them.
At 03:17 PM 4/18/2005, you wrote:
I don't think wave files can contain metadata tags.
Thanks,
Patrice
--- J7N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > generated mp3 file contains undesired parasite
> soun
I don't think wave files can contain metadata tags.
Thanks,
Patrice
--- J7N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > generated mp3 file contains undesired parasite
> sound.
>
> It may sound too simple. But aren't there any
> trailer info present
> in your wave file, like metadata tags of artist,
- Original Message -
From: "Catucci, Raymond A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:20 PM
Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame for Amiga
After searching for the lame program for classic amiga (OS3.9) I ended up
on
your site. Can you direct me to a place th
From: "Kim S. Andreasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame & national chars
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:05:11 +0100
> I can't get Lame (3.92 & 3.96) to dance with sound files having non-English
> characters in their names. It simply ignores such files.
> The same goes for ID3 tags. At b
I did it under a Sharp Zaurus SL5600, which is a Linux based PDA. But
its CPU for sure is Xscale. The Lame can be compiled well by cross
compiler, and it also can run. The problem is it takes 5 hours to
encode a 850K .wav file into mp3. (I think it is because of the
computation capability of Xscale
Geoff Shang wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> The quality scale was reorganised between those releases. If memory
> serves, what was quality 2 is now quality 3, with the quality 0 mode now
> painstakingly slow. I use 0 if quality matters and I have the time, but
> mostly I use 1 which is, at least in my exper
Hi:
The quality scale was reorganised between those releases. If memory
serves, what was quality 2 is now quality 3, with the quality 0 mode now
painstakingly slow. I use 0 if quality matters and I have the time, but
mostly I use 1 which is, at least in my experience 4-5 times faster than 0
(
hong yuan wrote:
>
> ./configure --enable-nasm
> and make it again
Thanks, but nothing seems to change.
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
What is the status of the x86_64 asm optimizations?
From: hong yuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MP3 encoders development list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MP3 encoders development list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame for Linux is slower than Windows
Date: Fri, 1
--- Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的正文：
> Hello. I noticed that the Lame encoder for Linux is
> slower than its
> conterpart for Windows. One thing I noticed is that
> Lame for Windows
> recognizes my CPU (an Athlon XP) and uses some
> optimizations, while Lame
> for Linux doesn't. Has anybody else
Geoff Shang wrote:
Luca wrote:
Hello. I noticed that the Lame encoder for Linux is slower than its
conterpart for Windows. One thing I noticed is that Lame for Windows
recognizes my CPU (an Athlon XP) and uses some optimizations, while
Lame for Linux doesn't. Has anybody else noticed something
Luca wrote:
Hello. I noticed that the Lame encoder for Linux is slower than its
conterpart for Windows. One thing I noticed is that Lame for Windows
recognizes my CPU (an Athlon XP) and uses some optimizations, while Lame for
Linux doesn't. Has anybody else noticed something like that?
Has your
I've never made any direct encoding using the digital stream.
What i do, is to take the audio from digital devices (in my case S/PDIF) and
record it to a wave file. Them, i do the encoding with lame.
This work fine since waves don't differentiate bettewn digital/analog.
But you must be carefull, i
I recall something about it leaving room for a VBR header, even if the
encoding is not VBR. This was discussed here some time back when I was
trying to figure out why my Sony MP3 boombox was choking on files created
with LAME.
Chris
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:12:59 -0500, Dennis Hining wrote:
> When
y Startsev
Cc: MP3 Encoder Liste
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] LAME Encoder with Delphi Help
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:00:38 +0400
"Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Alexander!
> You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MP3 encoders development list"
>
Hello, Gabe!
You wrote to "MP3 encoders development list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Thu, 3 Jun 2004 12:38:57 -0700:
GH> Does anyone have a reliable (and multi-threaded capable) COM wrapper
GH> for the LAME DLL? I've got a web application that compresses uploaded
GH> MP3's to a standard bitrate and
y Startsev
Cc: MP3 Encoder Liste
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] LAME Encoder with Delphi Help
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:00:38 +0400
"Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Alexander!
> You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MP3 encoders development list"
>
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:55:46 +0400
"Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Alexander!
> You wrote to "Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 2 Jun 2004
> 16:25:09 +0200:
>
> AL> mpglib is a subset of mpg123, did you read the comparision of mpg123
> AL> and madlib at the mad h
Hello, Alexander!
You wrote to "Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 2 Jun 2004
16:25:09 +0200:
AL> mpglib is a subset of mpg123, did you read the comparision of mpg123
AL> and madlib at the mad homepage (I don't think the author of mad does
AL> some tricks there)?
Yes, I did. But mpg123
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:00:38 +0400
"Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Alexander!
> You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MP3 encoders development list"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:17:49 +0200:
>
> AL> I suggest to use the madlib.dll for MP3 -> WAV conversion, it's
Hello, Alexander!
You wrote to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MP3 encoders development list"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:17:49 +0200:
AL> I suggest to use the madlib.dll for MP3 -> WAV conversion, it's
AL> "better" than the decoder in lame.
Since mpglib uses floating-point it should be mor
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:48:49 -0700
"Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was able to use the MP3 -> WAV converter component and it worked perfect.
> But it uses madlib.dll and vorbis codec's (dll's). I was wanting to know if
> you can do the same MP3 -> WAV conversion using just the LAME codec dll
Hello, Mikhail!
You wrote to "MP3 encoders development list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Sun, 16 May 2004 19:16:11 +0400:
MR> Is there a reliable Lame-based codec that one could install into
MR> Windows, to use with VirtualDub and the like?
MR> Yours, Mikhail Ramendik
There are two versions of Lam
- Original Message -
From: "Kristian Hermansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:17 AM
Subject: [mp3encoder] LAME --decode problems...
> Does anyone have any idea on my last post? Seems to be a bug in LAME...
Mpglib has problems with corrupt
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Vijayasaradhi D. wrote:
> Where do I can get document describing LAME Psychoacoustic model.
I am not a developer, just a humble user, but I'm guessing this is what you
want:
GPSYCHO: a GPL'd psycho acoustic and noise shaping model
http://lame.sourceforge.net/gpsycho/gpsycho.
Kristian Hermansen wrote:
Does anyone have any idea on my last post? Seems to be a bug in LAME...
You problem is related to decoding, as the problem is occuring in the
decoder.
Your problem is occuring in the middle of a huge 19MB mp3 file.
For practical reasons, we need a small sample where th
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew W. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MP3 encoders development list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] LAME --decode problems...
> >Yes, on my last post too (playing
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 06:09:03PM +0200, Titus wrote:
>From: "Kristian Hermansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Does anyone have any idea on my last post? Seems to be a bug in
>> LAME...
No, it's not a bug in LAME; it's a bug in mpglib (the MPEG audio
decoding library), which hasn't been updated in ove
- Original Message -
From: "Kristian Hermansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 6:17 AM
Subject: [mp3encoder] LAME --decode problems...
> Does anyone have any idea on my last post? Seems to be a bug in LAME...
Yes, on my last post too (playing
From: Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame stress test reveals problem
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:52:30 +0200
> > > I stress tested the new stable LAME 3.95.1 binary (official release from
> > > site)
> >
> > There's any &
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:47:11 +0900 (JST)
Takehiro Tominaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Kristian Hermansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame stress test reveals problem
> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:30:29 -0500
>
> > I stress tested the new stable LAME 3.95.1 binary (official
From: "Kristian Hermansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame stress test reveals problem
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:30:29 -0500
> I stress tested the new stable LAME 3.95.1 binary (official release from
> site)
There's any "OFFICIAL" binary.
> by re-encoding over 15.0 GB of MP
--- Robert Hegemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jay!
>
> lame 3.95 has several bugs that are fixed in current
> CVS.
> Please use 3.96 beta instead.
Will do :) I tried searching the archives for
anything about 48Khz but came up dry. Thanks for your
help.
=
Jay Dolan
Software Engi
Hi Jay!
lame 3.95 has several bugs that are fixed in current CVS.
Please use 3.96 beta instead.
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Dolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MP3 Encoder Liste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 7:15 PM
Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame segfault on 48KHz i
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 09:48:04 +
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Hi,
>Message: 3
>Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:57:22 +0100
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame for Mac OS X
>To: "MP3 encoders development list"
Hi
You will need to recompile the whole code written i C. MAC and OC doesn't
have the same CPU. Does MAC have similar units like Windows DLL. I'm a dummy
when it comes to MAC programming.
Lars
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sa
From: "Dmitriy Startsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mp3encoder] Lame decode bug
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:52:23 +0300
> I found some minor bugs in Lame 3.95.1 related to mp3 decoding, so here are
> my patch suggestions.
> Patch 2: function lame_decode_initfile() (frontend/get_audio.c) line 1458
Hi, Michelangelo!
Over 2GB support was requested for a long time.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=849889&group_id=290&atid=100290
But it is quite hard to support it "flawlessly" (at least for me...)
From: Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:43:27 +0100
"Michelangelo Nottoli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (question 1)
>
> can anyone suggest the correct #ifdefs for fopen/fopen64 calls? something
> like...
>
> #if defined(__unix__) || defined(__sun__)
> ...call fopen64
> #else
> ..call fopen
> #endif
>
> sound
- Original Message -
From: "Kristian Hermansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:24 PM
Subject: RE: [mp3encoder] LAME: Problem encoding some files...
> Version:
> RazorLame 1.1.5.1342 and LAME.exe packed with it
x27;s to the list? The
files are about 30 MB each. Maybe I could just shove them onto my personal
FTP server...
Kristian Hermansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Bouvigne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:30 AM
To: MP3 encoders development
Kristian Hermansen wrote:
I had some trouble encoding a few files. LAME crashed on me a few times and
First, we need a few information:
*version of Lame
*compiler used (eventually)
*parameters used
*does Lame crash on every files or just some specific files
*does Lame always crash on some files,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:57:14PM -0800, Noel B. Boon wrote:
>Anyone hear of a plan to implement the more advanced ID3v2 tags via
>lame?
I know not what course others may take, but as for me, I don't use
LAME's ID3 tag options at all, and prefer to use id3lib's associated
utils id3tag, id3info, i
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:57:14 -0800
"Noel B. Boon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone hear of a plan to implement the more advanced ID3v2 tags via lame?
I suggest to read the archives of the mp3encoder and the lame-dev lists
for an answer to your question.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I will
Narayanan wrote:
I would be highly obliged if any of you can provide me a good
documentation/information on the latest LAME MP3 encoder code flow.I have
downloaded the version 3.94 and started analyzing the same.
Also if anyone can guide me through the initial phase, it would be good.
I uploaded
There are 2 things you need to know
1) how to call DLLs from VB.
2) how to call the lame dll.
Not sure which one you are wanting guidance on.
1) is fairly easy, though I don't remember the exact method now. A
search on google / microsoft knowledge base / vb help files should
reveal the answer so
Thanks Gabriel,
I double checked the stereo / joint-stereo thing. Problem remains. As
opposed to what I wrote earlier the problem exists with bladeenc as
well. I will try to get rid of the (un)lucky Goldstar and buy something
real...
Regards
Thomas
Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
Thomas Gallenkamp
Thomas Gallenkamp a écrit :
I am experiencing problems playing back LAME encoded MP3s on my new LG
DVD-6054 DVD/MP3 player. The same MP3s played perfectly on all other MP3
players (mp3blaster, mpg123, mplayer, Scott 838 DVD player, JVC KD-S891R
car stereo) I tested so far. There are distortions on
LiFe a écrit :
Hi Guys,
Out of interest how come lame development has stopped since 2002?
Development is not stopped, but slow.
That is because of the lack of human ressources, and the lack of time of
available ressources.
Some of the work is also done "behind the scene". As an example,
T
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 07:22:50 +
"Yosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you expand a little more on what is planned for Lame 4.0?
You should ask Takehiro, 4.0 is his baby (so far).
There's no official "this is planned" list, Takehiro has some ideas
(quality improvements) he wants to try for 4
From: Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MP3 encoders development list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MP3 encoders development list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame Dev
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 14:57:19 +0200
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:12:31 +1000
"LiFe&quo
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame Dev
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:12:31 +1000
> "LiFe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well I can't say a lot has happened since 2002 So when is this
>
> Obvious
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:12:31 +1000
"LiFe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I can't say a lot has happened since 2002 So when is this
Obviously you don't know about how the development within lame is
organised, so it doesn't matter what you can or can't say about it.
Where do you see potentia
encoders development list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame Dev
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:12:32 +1000
> "LiFe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> > Out of interest how come lame
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
