Nice thought for work on library management...
See here and solve yr problem
http://www.freestudentprojects.com/java-projects/library-management-system-3/
--
View this message in context:
http://mono-for-android.1047100.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-reflection-tp5713582p5713638.html
Sent from t
I workedaround this by using "linking sdk + user" and putted my
library-assembly in the "skip linking" section. But for future things, maybe
we can still fix my problem with "linking sdk only" ?!
regards
Lee
--
View this message in context:
http://mono-for-android.1047100.n5.nabble.com/Problem
I always thought, that the linker only removes complete unused classes.
didn't know, that the linker removes single properties. thanks for this
info.
Due to a large apk-size (30mb without linking / 8mb with full linking) I
always used link sdk + user to get the smallest possible size.
When I use
On Oct 18, 2013, at 10:57 AM, JLee wrote:
> After outsourcing the code into a library-project i get the following
> exception:
>
> System.ArgumentException: Set Method not found for 'Standardwert'
The property has been removed by the linker. It doesn't exist.
> Under Release (with linking sdk
Hello,
i'm filling classproperties over reflection. After outsourcing the code into
a library-project i get the following exception:
System.ArgumentException: Set Method not found for 'Standardwert'
at System.Reflection.MonoProperty.SetValue (System.Object obj,
System.Object value, BindingFlags
This was actually an issue that I ran into a couple of weeks ago. There has
been a bug filed already for this issue. As you found out, the inspector
was the issue even if the value was properly set.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5172
Chaitanya Marvici
--
View this message in co
Nevermind, it is working correctly. The quick inspector isn't showing the
correct value, but if I add something like "DateTime? j = p.Timmy" it is
correct.
On 5 June 2012 09:40, Goncalo Oliveira wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> There seems to be an issue with reflection when setting a nullable generic
> prop
Hi,
There seems to be an issue with reflection when setting a nullable generic
property value.
public class DummyJoe
{
public DateTime? Timmy
{
get;
set;
}
}
DummyJoe p = new DummyJoe();
Type type = p.GetType();
