In perl.modules, you wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lunartear
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, _brian_d_foy wrote:
>>
>> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lunartear
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Term::Visterm or Term::Visual will be ok.
>> > >
>> > > If n
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:06:09 -0600, _brian_d_foy wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lunartear
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, _brian_d_foy wrote:
>>
>> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lunartear
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Term::Visterm or Term::Visual wi
th during an edit
session. [...]
Q Exit vi (or visual) mode and switch to ex mode.
- vi(1) man page
-- Rocco Caputo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://poe.perl.org/
ignore
Article cancelled by slrn 0.9.7.4
ignore
Article cancelled by slrn 0.9.7.4
/Autrijus/
Agreed here. POE::Component:: is a wide, open space in need of
structure.
-- Rocco Caputo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://poe.perl.org/
back semantics.
The CPAN has a couple examples already:
http://search.cpan.org/author/RCAPUTO/POE-Session-MessageBased-0.01/MessageBased.pm
http://search.cpan.org/author/CWEST/POE-Session-MultiDispatch-1.3/MultiDispatch.pm
You can tell I'm very excited about all this. :)
--
Rocco Caputo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://poe.perl.org/
prefer that they stay in POE's category anyway?
-- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / poe.perl.org / poe.sourceforge.net
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2001 14:44:09 -0400, Rocco Caputo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I'm requesting a category change for POE, but I honestly don't know
> > which chapter
utilities). Since it's a top-level
namespace, I can't do that myself from the PAUSE.
Thank you for your consideration.
-- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / poe.perl.org / poe.sourceforge.net
::TCP
in the main distribution.
None of this is written in stone. If there's a better interface to the
CPAN's structure, I'll be happy to promote and use it. If you would like
to see the namespace hold a certain structure (or even be dispersed), I
can document it in the POE::Component manpage.
-- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Out of curiosity, would Device:: be a better namespace for physical robotic
devices?
--
Rocco Caputo - rcap...@pobox.com
On Jan 20, 2011, at 19:21, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
>
> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
>
> modid: Robo
turn in the bundle.
I've written a short hack to using CPANDB and Graph::Directed to install
bundles in optimal orders. It's made setting up perlbrew installs a bit more
pleasant: https://github.com/rcaputo/bundlefly
--
Rocco Caputo - rcap...@pobox.com
13 matches
Mail list logo