On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> Can you give an outline of what Log::Dispatch does?
I'll summarize since I'm the author.
Log::Dispatch has two parts. The first is the dispatch object, which
takes messages and levels (i.e. error, criticial, warning) and passes them
to all of its i
One other thing that would probably be worth knowing about Log::Dispatch
is that it only works with perl 5.005 or greater (it uses pseudo-hashes
and compile time object typing). This may or may not be relevant but
since this is somewhat unusual for CPAN modules I thought people should
know this.
I'd like to officially register the following two modules:
Thesaurus
DSLI - RdpO
Create associations between related things
Thesaurus::File
DSLI - RdpO
Persitence via CSV files
Thesaurus::DBM
DSLI - RdpO
Persistence via DBM files
Thesaurus::DBI
DSLI - idpO
Persistence in a database via
I'll be uploading two new modules to CPAN that I'd like to register if
possible (CPAN id DROLSKY).
1. StackTrace - This provides a stacktrace object very similar to what you
get from confess or cluck but you don't have to actually issue a
warning. Plus you can step through the stack and examine
This has been bugging me for a while. Basically, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems
like sort of a black box. I send messages it to it and it seems that they
go to some list of people (Andreas, G. Barr, J. Pritikin, K. Starsinic,
???) and then sometimes I get a response and sometimes not. Note, this
has n
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a council of wise elders who give advice on
> module naming, when they feel that their wisdom is applicable. A more
> accurate version of the above quote might be:
>
> `Generally, a lack of response can be taken as an
On 27 Jun 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > 1. StackTrace - This provides a stacktrace object very similar to what you
>
> Good idea. What about Devel::StackTrace. It will be used to develop
> code, not in other situations, so Devel:: seems appropriate.
Hmm, I'm not sure I like Devel:: all th
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Graham Barr wrote:
> That is an understatement, but all the people involved have different
> ideas/needs etc..
Maybe we need a discussion forum for this work. I favor a
subscriber-post-only mailing list myself and I think it would be fairly
low traffic. Basically, just inv
On 27 Jun 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> Disclaimer: please note, English is not my mother tongue. If in doubt
> about my words, please give me a chance to clarify before you shoot.
I think you're pretty clear.
> That's impossible due to a lack of resources. We are not a funded
> institution.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Graham Barr wrote:
> If you are to discuss anything it should be open. Why have subscriber-post-only ?
Because if you don't care enough to subscribe then you shouldn't be able
to post. That's just my general mailing list philosophy (and it helps
prevent some random spam I t
On 27 Jun 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > Devel::StackTrace
> > Exception::Class
> > Exception::Class::Base
>
> OK, noted. Will add it to the module list later today.
I just noted that Devel::StackTrace has something it uses internally
called StackTraceFrame (as the trace is really a set
11 matches
Mail list logo
