Steffen Mueller wrote:
On 11/21/2011 09:58 AM, Neil Bowers wrote:
Maybe instead of just this Covenant, we have a number of Ownership /
Maintenance statements, one of which is the one I proposed, but
another of which would something along the lines of:
If you put something on CPAN and don
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Linda W wrote:
> Steffen Mueller wrote:
>
>> On 11/21/2011 09:58 AM, Neil Bowers wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe instead of just this Covenant, we have a number of Ownership /
>>> Maintenance statements, one of which is the one I proposed, but
>>> another of which would somet
On 11/21/2011 09:58 AM, Neil Bowers wrote:
Maybe instead of just this Covenant, we have a number of Ownership /
Maintenance statements, one of which is the one I proposed, but
another of which would something along the lines of:
This is my module, I don't want it handing over unless I've either
hi,
On 11/11/20 17:00 +0100, Steffen Mueller wrote:
> >In the discussion on module-authors, and talking to people at the London
> >Perl Workshop (LPW): about 60% thought it was a good idea, 20% a bad idea,
> >and
> >20% indifferent. Most of the 'bad' being "it works that way already".
>
> Sadly,
Hi Steffen,
>>I hereby give modules@perl.org permission to grant co-maintainership
>>to [% distribution %], if all the following conditions are met:
>
> Refer to the "PAUSE administrators" instead of modules@perl.org? A mailing
> list is a weird thing to carry authority. :)
Ah, that's t
Hi Neil,
thank you for your work! I think it's very important.
On 11/17/2011 09:13 AM, Neil Bowers wrote:
A week ago I posted a proposal for a voluntary pledge, which CPAN
module authors could sign up to. With Bill Ward's tweak to the wording,
the discussion on per-distribution stating, and gen
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:55:09 -0500
> Von: Yanick Champoux
> An: Neil Bowers
> CC: module-auth...@perl.org, modules@perl.org
> Betreff: Re: The CPAN Covenant
> On 11-11-17 03:08 PM, yan...@babyl.dyndns.org wrote:
> > Dist:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:06:54PM +0100, "Burak G?rsoy" wrote:
> I think something like this must be standalone like Software::License.
> Attaching it to Dist::Zilla limits the audience heavily.
Very good point. I'll extract the
pledge wording itself to a separate distribution (CPAN::Cov
On 11-11-17 03:08 PM, yan...@babyl.dyndns.org wrote:
Dist::Zilla::Plugin::Covenant coming to CPAN real soon (or even
sooner if somebody beats me to it:-) ).
Tadah! https://github.com/yanick/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Covenant
Caveat maximus emptor: this should only be considered a p
Sounds good to me ... I hereby accept this covenant for the modules I
maintain, present and future, until such time as I indicate otherwise in
email to modules@perl.org
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Neil Bowers wrote:
> A week ago I posted a proposal for a voluntary pledge, which CPAN
> modu
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:13:45AM +, Neil Bowers wrote:
> A week ago I posted a proposal for a voluntary pledge, which CPAN
> module authors could sign up to. With Bill Ward's tweak to the wording,
> the discussion on per-distribution stating, and generalising the RT point:
>
>I hereby gi
A week ago I posted a proposal for a voluntary pledge, which CPAN
module authors could sign up to. With Bill Ward's tweak to the wording,
the discussion on per-distribution stating, and generalising the RT point:
I hereby give modules@perl.org permission to grant co-maintainership
to [% dist
12 matches
Mail list logo
