> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:13:08 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> But I am concerned that the distribution would be handled properly by
> PAUSE. There is no top-level Makefile.PL, there are modules throughout the
> distribution in a few places, etc.
Probably, but feel free
At 21:56 +0200 2001.10.04, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:29:09 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > At 15:30 +0200 2001.09.27, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> >> I'm asking because there are pending registrations for Slash::OurNet
> >> and Slash::Syndicate. I do
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:29:09 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> At 15:30 +0200 2001.09.27, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> I'm asking because there are pending registrations for Slash::OurNet
>> and Slash::Syndicate. I downloaded slash-2.0.0 and as there is no
>> conflict, I s
At 15:30 +0200 2001.09.27, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>I'm asking because there are pending registrations for Slash::OurNet
>and Slash::Syndicate. I downloaded slash-2.0.0 and as there is no
>conflict, I suppose I should register them. Right?
Yes, that sounds fine to me.
I am wondering if there's
odules (and there are several now; at least a
> dozen in the Slash namespace) have not been committed to CPAN, but are
> merely a part of the Slash distribution, which is not really designed at
> this point to be put on CPAN in the modules section.
I'm asking because there are pend
At 06:53 +0200 2001.09.26, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>is slash being used as toplevel namespace? Should it?
It is, though the Slash modules (and there are several now; at least a
dozen in the Slash namespace) have not been committed to CPAN, but are
merely a part of
Hi Chris,
is slash being used as toplevel namespace? Should it?
--
andreas
