Re: Repeating Registration Request for New Module: Sendmail::Milter

2000-08-07 Thread Charles Ying
On Sat, 5 Aug 2000, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote: KDS> I think that you've chosen the right name for your module. KDS> Go for it! Thanks, now I'm just wondering where the module list maintainers have gone; they haven't still haven't approved the module for inclusion in the list. (But this is th

Re: Repeating Registration Request for New Module: Sendmail::Milter

2000-08-05 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 04:34:02PM -0700, Charles Ying wrote: > On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote: > KDS> I think that `Milter' is nondescriptively cute. How about > KDS> Sendmail::Filter? > > 'Milter' means something specific to Sendmail, it is the term used to > describe sendmail

Re: Repeating Registration Request for New Module: Sendmail::Milter

2000-08-04 Thread Charles Ying
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote: KDS> I think that `Milter' is nondescriptively cute. How about KDS> Sendmail::Filter? 'Milter' means something specific to Sendmail, it is the term used to describe sendmail's Mail Filter API (libmilter.a, FFR_MILTER, etc.). Filter would be too o

Re: Repeating Registration Request for New Module: Sendmail::Milter

2000-08-04 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 08:06:40PM -0700, Charles Ying wrote: > It has now been *3* weeks (2000-07-13) since I made the original module > registration request for this module. (The max amount of time to allow for > a module to be registered) I have yet to hear a response back so I assume > that th

Repeating Registration Request for New Module: Sendmail::Milter

2000-08-03 Thread Charles Ying
It has now been *3* weeks (2000-07-13) since I made the original module registration request for this module. (The max amount of time to allow for a module to be registered) I have yet to hear a response back so I assume that the namespace is alright. I hope that the module list maintainers haven'