On 02-04-24 18:43:56 CEST, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > somehow ron's become co-maint for X500::DN.
>
> > and i can't do anything about it, " 2.4 Remove co-maintainer NOT YET
> > IMPLEMENTED".
>
> Now you can.
tried, works, thanks! :-)
rj
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:52:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Joop) said:
> On 02-04-23 12:41:59 CEST, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> Let me know when mistakes remain that need fixing.
> well, i discovered this quickly, but thought this time i'll wait a
> little, perhaps it fixes itsel
On 02-04-23 12:41:59 CEST, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> Let me know when mistakes remain that need fixing.
well, i discovered this quickly, but thought this time i'll wait a
little, perhaps it fixes itself when the database syncs up... :-)
somehow ron's become co-maint for X500::DN.
https://pause
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:49:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Joop) said:
>> This is the consequence of what I did yesterday on the PAUSE, as I
>> posted in my message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> no, it was definitely before that.
Well, it is a bit confusing, too many errors and correction
On 02-04-23 10:37:25 CEST, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > when i go to http://search.cpan.org/ and search for module "x500", i
> > find my modules only--strange.
> > maybe this has to do with the interesting fact that when one goes to your
> > CPAN page, http://search.cpan.org/search?mode=au
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:12:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Joop) said:
> On 02-04-23 03:01:48 CEST, Ron Savage wrote:
>> Yesterday I searched CPAN for my and Robert's modules, and had great
>> difficulty finding them. The major CPAN categories are of course
>> quite old and, while
On 02-04-23 03:01:48 CEST, Ron Savage wrote:
> Yesterday I searched CPAN for my and Robert's modules, and had great
> difficulty finding them. The major CPAN categories are of course
> quite old and, while good in a general sense, are far from perfect.
when i go to http://search.cpan.org/ and s
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:21:06 +0200, Robert Joop wrote:
Folks
>On 02-04-22 15:06:40 CEST, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>>(CC'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not anymore to [EMAIL PROTECTED], where
>>the
>>thread started.)
>
>i tried to start the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] six days ago, but
>while
>i got
On 02-04-22 15:06:40 CEST, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> (CC'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not anymore to [EMAIL PROTECTED], where the
> thread started.)
i tried to start the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] six days ago, but while
i got my CPAN id in less than 24 hours, my questions weren't answered. :-)
(CC'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not anymore to [EMAIL PROTECTED], where the
thread started.)
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:28:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Joop) said:
> On 02-04-22 13:06:59 CEST, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> > On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:49:18 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ro
10 matches
Mail list logo
