> On Thu, 10 May 2001 22:28:52 -0700, "Kurt D. Starsinic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 02:29:52PM -0400, Kirrily Skud Robert wrote:
>> Johan and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>>
>> What is the "official" best way to manage a module which may have
>> different people ac
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 02:29:52PM -0400, Kirrily Skud Robert wrote:
> Johan and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>
> What is the "official" best way to manage a module which may have
> different people acting as release managers over time? It seems
> like the only current way is to just have the release m
ch a thing?
K.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 03:43:08PM -0400, srl wrote:
|
| -- Forwarded message --
| Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 19:03:12 +0200
| From: Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: srl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject
[Quoting srl, on March 30 2001, 11:45, in "request CPAN id REEF"]
> Hi. I'd like to request the CPAN ID REEFKNOT. I'm a team
> representative for the Reefknot project,
We're sorry, but it is against our policy to provide CPAN ids for
companies and organisations.
-- Johan
On 2 Apr 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> We really dislike two letter acronyms for module names even if the
> underlying original code slipped through the cracks with two letters.
Okay no problem.
> I could probably live with Router::LG. But nearly anything is better
> than a two letter root
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:08:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Josephes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> Name: Chris Josephes
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Preferred Id: CHRISJ
> Contribution:
> Name DSLIDescription
>
> LG.pmbdpOAllows remote
