Dear Gentlemen,
I am writing to thank you for your letters and say,
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:47:12AM -0800, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> At 02:59 PM 2003-05-28 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >Nagios::* is appropriate here.
>
> Okiedoke!
>
> --
> Sean M. Burkehttp://search.cpan.org/~sburke/
>
I am
At 02:59 PM 2003-05-28 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
Nagios::* is appropriate here.
Okiedoke!
--
Sean M. Burkehttp://search.cpan.org/~sburke/
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:53:39AM -0800, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> At 04:39 PM 2003-05-28 +1000, Stanley Hopcroft wrote:
> >With respect, I think Net:: is less appropriate because while many of the
> >Net:: modules deal with or implement a network protocol (::SMTP, ::SNMP,
> >::DNS hopefully ::Samb
Dear Gentlemen,
I am very grateful for your contributing to making the world a better
place (you have for me) and I thank you most sincerely.
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:06:17AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:56:02PM -0800, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> > >Please would you comment
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:56:02PM -0800, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> At 03:47 PM 2003-05-28 +1000, Stanley Hopcroft wrote:
> >Please would you comment on the use of the namespace 'Nagios' for Perl
> >modules related to the Nagios (http://www.Nagios.ORG/) availability
> >monitoring system.
>
> Can't we
At 04:39 PM 2003-05-28 +1000, Stanley Hopcroft wrote:
With respect, I think Net:: is less appropriate because while many of the
Net:: modules deal with or implement a network protocol (::SMTP, ::SNMP,
::DNS hopefully ::Samba::SMB), 'Nagios' is a program to monitor the
availability of services su
At 03:47 PM 2003-05-28 +1000, Stanley Hopcroft wrote:
Please would you comment on the use of the namespace 'Nagios' for Perl
modules related to the Nagios (http://www.Nagios.ORG/) availability
monitoring system.
Can't we have this be under some existing top-level category
(Net::Nagios...)? I know
