Re: Naming a module that injects new code into a file's source at compile time

2011-11-01 Thread Eric Strom
Thanks for the feedback. So do you think I should simultaneously post to module-authors and p5p? Or hit module-authors first? On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Steffen Mueller wrote: > Generally speaking, you're much more likely to get useful feedback if you > post to the module-authors list or

Re: Naming a module that injects new code into a file's source at compile time

2011-11-01 Thread Steffen Mueller
On 10/31/2011 09:47 PM, Eric Strom wrote: Thanks for the feedback. So do you think I should simultaneously post to module-authors and p5p? Or hit module-authors first? Don't cross-post on these lists, please. Too many subscribers. :) I'd say try module-authors first. Cheers, Steffen

Re: Naming a module that injects new code into a file's source at compile time

2011-10-31 Thread Steffen Mueller
Generally speaking, you're much more likely to get useful feedback if you post to the module-authors list or blog about it. modules@perl.org is mostly an administrative list of PAUSE admins and we're spread a bit thin. On 10/30/2011 02:32 AM, Eric Strom wrote: I am working on a module and set

Re: Naming a module...

2002-07-30 Thread Tim Bunce
If you don't intend turning into something prolog like then perhaps: Math::Predicate Math::PredicateLogic Otherwise something like Language::Prolog... would be reasonable. But have you looked at and/or offered to help develop this on? http://search-beta.cpan.org/author/LGODDARD/Languag

Re: Naming a module - Which::Phase ?

2002-01-07 Thread Tim Bunce
The Perl::* category seems reasonable. Perhaps Perl::WhichPhase Tim. On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:03:40AM -0600, James G Smith wrote: > I have a module that needs a name. I've looked through the Camel, > browsed through CPAN, and nothing seems to be suggesting itself as > obvious. > > Thanks for