What do I actually need to do to get Class::ReturnValue into the modules list at this
point, then?
Thanks,
Jesse
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:28:03PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:36:18AM -0500, Jesse wrote:
> > Well, this one isn't actually something that change
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:36:18AM -0500, Jesse wrote:
> Well, this one isn't actually something that changes control flow. It's
> more of an object with rich behaviour that a method can hand back to its
> caller, who can work with it in more ways than your usual return value.
Sure, but it's rol
Well, this one isn't actually something that changes control flow. It's
more of an object with rich behaviour that a method can hand back to its
caller, who can work with it in more ways than your usual return value.
It is, like most things these days, intended to be a base class that an
author
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:09:11PM -0800, William R Ward wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perl Authors Upload Server) writes:
> > modid: Return::Value
> > Return::Value is an object which encapsulates most of the standard
> > behaviors for function/method return values. It allows a func
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perl Authors Upload Server) writes:
> modid: Return::Value
> Return::Value is an object which encapsulates most of the standard
> behaviors for function/method return values. It allows a function to
> return an object that is treated as a boolean in boolean c
