On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:20:35AM +0100, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
> > how about:
> >
> > TAL::Petal
>
> Mhhh, didn't think about that... That's definitely interesting. I like
> it because there is no module which is called 'TAL', so there can't be
> any confusion.
>
> What do other people
> how about:
>
> TAL::Petal
Mhhh, didn't think about that... That's definitely interesting. I like
it because there is no module which is called 'TAL', so there can't be
any confusion.
What do other people think? Would TAL::Petal be acceptable?
(Note I still prefer 'Petal' :-))
Cheers,
-
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 05:37:41PM +0100, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
> On Tue 30-Jul-2002 at 05:10:57PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:01:36PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > I think Template::Petal will work just fine. XML::Template I do
> > > not like, "XML::" is qui
> words, it makes sense without the XML bits but doesn't do anything without
> the templating bits. As such, I think that Template::Petal just works great.
At first, I would have loved to see simply 'Petal' (it's not like it's
too generic...) but it doesn't seem possible.
Everyone seem to think
On Tuesday 30 July 2002 18:37, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
> On Tue 30-Jul-2002 at 05:10:57PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:01:36PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > I think Template::Petal will work just fine. XML::Template I do
> > > not like, "XML::" is quickly becomi
On Tue 30-Jul-2002 at 05:10:57PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:01:36PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > I think Template::Petal will work just fine. XML::Template I do
> > not like, "XML::" is quickly becoming is as information-free as "Sys::""
>
> Agreed.
Well, except
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:01:36PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> I think Template::Petal will work just fine. XML::Template I do
> not like, "XML::" is quickly becoming is as information-free as "Sys::""
Agreed.
Tim.
I think Template::Petal will work just fine. XML::Template I do
not like, "XML::" is quickly becoming is as information-free as "Sys::""
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
> Could use Text::Petal (or Text::PerlTAL)
Well, no, Petal processes exclusively XML or HTML... So being under
Text:: does not seem appropriate. Being under XML: might actually be
better, given the fact that it's what Petal has been developed for.
> You could also use Template::Petal (or Templa
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 04:42:06PM +0200, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
>
> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
>
> modid: Petal
> DSLIP: bmpOa
> description: Perl Template Attribute Language
> userid: JHIVER (Jean-Michel Hiver)
> ch
10 matches
Mail list logo
