[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Duncan McGreggor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys, I heard back from the author...
>>
>> What he wants to do for now is use the following:
>>
>> Data::RRD::SharedModule
>> Data::RRD::Piped
>
>i don't have a problem with those nam
Hey guys, I heard back from the author...
What he wants to do for now is use the following:
Data::RRD::SharedModule
Data::RRD::Piped
I have pasted his comment below:
>> I will talk this over with the author and see what he has to say -
>thanks
>> for your help and input!
>
the reason for it to
I will talk this over with the author and see what he has to say - thanks
for your help and input!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Perl Authors
>Upload Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
>>
>> mod
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Perl Authors
Upload Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
>
> modid: Data::RRDs
> DSLIP: Rdhfg
> description: Access rrdtool as a shared module
what is a shared module?
a better n
