I should clarify -- yes the next uploader will get first-come, as if no one
had ever had that namespace before. But please don't do that for namespaces
that are attached to legitimate modules that people might still be using!
No signal is given that you are no longer interested in the modules -- so
Correct!
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Yuval Kogman
wrote:
> Does that just give the next uploader first come privileges? If so I think
> I will do that for all of my modules
>
> On 19 Oct 2016 19:18, "Karen Etheridge" wrote:
>
>> I would suggest simply dropping ownership on all namespaces y
Does that just give the next uploader first come privileges? If so I think
I will do that for all of my modules
On 19 Oct 2016 19:18, "Karen Etheridge" wrote:
> I would suggest simply dropping ownership on all namespaces you're not
> interested in. There doesn't have to be a new owner.
>
> On We
I would suggest simply dropping ownership on all namespaces you're not
interested in. There doesn't have to be a new owner.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Chad Granum wrote:
> I do not need 't1', but I can still grab it if you are desperate to be rid
> of it.
>
> -Chad
>
> On Oct 19, 2016 4:51
I do not need 't1', but I can still grab it if you are desperate to be rid
of it.
-Chad
On Oct 19, 2016 4:51 AM, "Yuval Kogman" wrote:
> Failed to reply to all... Sorry
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Yuval Kogman
> Date: 19 October 2016 at 12:48
> Subject: Re: The 't2' n
