> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:44:11 -0800 (PST), David Muir Sharnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> * That is still not a good idea. As brian says, metainformation
> * like that should not encoded in the module name. Also, it wouldn't
> * necessarily encode *enough* information, such as wheth
* That is still not a good idea. As brian says, metainformation
* like that should not encoded in the module name. Also, it wouldn't
* necessarily encode *enough* information, such as whether the author
* has some recommendations to use instead of the deprecated one.
*
* Why can't the Makefile.P
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 04:56:32PM -0800, David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
> * In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
> * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *
> * > I propose that the Deprecated:: prefex be added to modules
> * > whose use is discouraged by the module's author.
> *
> * that wo
On Jan 01, David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
> * In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
> * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *
> * > I propose that the Deprecated:: prefex be added to modules
> * > whose use is discouraged by the module's author.
> *
> * that would not work. people may need
* In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*
* > I propose that the Deprecated:: prefex be added to modules
* > whose use is discouraged by the module's author.
*
* that would not work. people may need the module to work with
* older code. the namespace
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose that the Deprecated:: prefex be added to modules
> whose use is discouraged by the module's author.
that would not work. people may need the module to work with
older code. the namespace is not a good p
