Thank you both for the good advice... I will follow up.
--Sinan
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 1:53 PM Karen Etheridge wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:42 AM Nicolas R. wrote:
>
>> IMO the "Don't declare a dependency on Crypt::SSLeay" statement should
>> not only live on a blog post.
>> We should ad
I had not seen the earlier message.
Quite frankly, with IO::Socket::SSL & Net::SSLeay, I don't see the need for
further development on this module.
See also
https://www.nu42.com/2014/08/dont-declare-dependency-on-cryptssleay.html
and previous linked post.
I humbly think further development effor
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:42 AM Nicolas R. wrote:
> IMO the "Don't declare a dependency on Crypt::SSLeay" statement should not
> only live on a blog post.
> We should add the statement to the main POD with probably a link to the
> blog.
> And also consider removing it from distro using it in a n
Thanks Sinan, for your return.
I clearly understand your statement and recommendations. This looks like a
sane direction to me.
Note that multiple Perl distro depends on this package, view
https://metacpan.org/module/Crypt::SSLeay/requires
Crypt-SSLeay is pretty high in the CPAN River, and will be
