Re: CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-10 Thread Arthur Corliss
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Philip Newton wrote: > One solution that may or may not apply in your case: upload one more > "version" with the old name whose README and/or Makefile.PL (probably > both) state that "This module has been superseded by New::Module::Name, > which has the same interface. Please u

Re: CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-08 Thread Philip Newton
[Disclaimer: I'm not a CPAN guy.] On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:55:15 -0900 (AKST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur Corliss) wrote: > The biggest quandry I have is a matter of cleaning up: do I risk > breaking existing scripts out there by deleting Parse::PlainConfig > from CPAN? Or do I just funnel all futu

Re: CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-08 Thread Arthur Corliss
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > Thank you, Arthur, for voicing your frustration. We do not have a > bullet proof concept how to avoid frustration, but what happened to > you seems avoidable. :-) Thanks for hearing me out. > Well, at least there it really says: You need *not* wait.

Re: CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-08 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
Thank you, Arthur, for voicing your frustration. We do not have a bullet proof concept how to avoid frustration, but what happened to you seems avoidable. > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:27:07 -0900 (AKST), Arthur Corliss ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Greetings: > Let me start by saying I know yo