Re: Namespace Tie::Excel

2003-11-07 Thread Tim Bunce
If you really wanted to go that way then I'd suggest Spreadsheet::Tie::Excel, Spreadsheet::Tie::Gnumeric etc with a Spreadsheet::Tie module acting as an interface. But I suspect Excel is the only one that'll be implemented as most other spreadsheets can read Excel format. Tim. On Thu, Nov 06, 20

Re: Namespace Tie::Excel

2003-11-06 Thread Simone Cesano
First of all thanks a lot for answering. Spreadsheet::* sounds good. On the other hand, I know it might be late to consider this, but what happens if someone comes up with an interface to Gnumeric? Do we start again with Spreadsheet::TieGnumeric etc.? In this light what's your opinion on Spread

Re: Namespace Tie::Excel

2003-11-06 Thread Tim Bunce
There's a Spreadsheet::* namespace with things like Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Utility and Spreadsheet::WriteExcel. So perhaps Spreadsheet::TieExcel would be good. Tim. On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:02:05AM +0100, Simone Cesano wrote: > Hello, > > I am thinking about uploading a module to CPAN. > >

Namespace Tie::Excel

2003-11-05 Thread Simone Cesano
Hello, I am thinking about uploading a module to CPAN. It is an interface to Excel, so that by tieing filehandles, scalars or arrays you can write transparently to Excel as if it were a Perl variable. I thought about calling the module Tie::Excel providing packages Tie::Excel::Scal