Hi Brian,
In that case, I'd go for Daemon::Shutdown
Thanks!
-Robin-
On 15/06/11 19:31, brian d foy wrote:
> [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
>the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
>
> In article <97842ddf8d945e0911cdd8df0586b846.squir...@mail.htmlco.de>,
>
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <97842ddf8d945e0911cdd8df0586b846.squir...@mail.htmlco.de>,
Robin Clarke wrote:
> What's the protocol now - resubmit request with another name?
If you tell me which one you wan
Hi Brian,
Was talking about my generic non-descriptive namespace request at work
today, and other suggestion were:
Sys::Daemon::Shutdown
Daemon::Shutdown
I'm not religiously attached to anything, but slightly prefer
Daemon::Shutdown (everything is a System, and there could be more (perl)
Daemons)
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <201106111345.p5bdjyxy024...@pause.fiz-chemie.de>, Perl
Authors Upload Server wrote:
> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
>
> modid: SD
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: SDD
DSLIP: bdpOp
description: Shutdown Daemon
userid: RCL (Robin Clarke)
chapterid: 4 (Operating_System_Interfaces)
communities:
http://www.robinclarke.net/archives/shutdown-daemon
sim