On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:14:21AM +0100, Tels wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Moin,
>
> On 26-Nov-01 Tim Bunce tried to scribble about:
> > Umm, Dev:: isn't really the right category for this.
> >
> > Perhaps Business::Bollocks would be better.
>
> But it is essential "/dev/bo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Tels) wrote:
> On 26-Nov-01 Tim Bunce tried to scribble about:
> > Umm, Dev:: isn't really the right category for this.
> > Perhaps Business::Bollocks would be better.
> But it is essential "/dev/bollocks". I know that there is "Device::" but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 26-Nov-01 Tim Bunce tried to scribble about:
> Umm, Dev:: isn't really the right category for this.
>
> Perhaps Business::Bollocks would be better.
But it is essential "/dev/bollocks". I know that there is "Device::" but I
think it is misnamed (too l
Umm, Dev:: isn't really the right category for this.
Perhaps Business::Bollocks would be better.
1/2 :-)
Tim.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:29:47PM +0100, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
>
> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
>
> modid: Dev::Bollocks
>
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: Dev::Bollocks
DSLIP: bdpOp
description: Arbitrary sized bollocks from management
userid: TELS (Tels)
chapterid: 23 (Miscellaneous_Modules)
communities:
none
similar:
/dev/bollocks
