On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Matt Luker wrote:
> So, is there room for competing implementations in CPAN, or do we try to
> just do things in a harmonious way? Should I publish my package as
> well? Or should I try to integrate with a team?
ask the other people working on the Date/Time modules and see
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Luker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just found Date::Handler (no, I don't know how I missed it). It
> appears to be very complete. Sigh. I will look at the code and see if
> I have anything to contribute.
> > modid: Date::Object
you might also che
I just found Date::Handler (no, I don't know how I missed it). It
appears to be very complete. Sigh. I will look at the code and see if
I have anything to contribute.
Darn. Sorry for the dupe. I'll double-check my double-check next time
:-(
Matt
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 11:32, Perl Authors Upl
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: Date::Object
DSLIP: RdpOl
description: DateObj, a mathemagical Date object library
userid: MLUKER (Matt Luker)
chapterid:6 (Data_Type_Utilities)
communities:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
simila
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: Date::Object
DSLIP: bdpOp
description: OO wrapper that allows math operations
userid: MLUKER (Matt Luker)
chapterid:6 (Data_Type_Utilities)
communities:
mail newsgroups, CVS
similar
