28/01/2002 14:14:04, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:23:44AM +0100, Giuseppe Maxia wrote:
>> 31/12/2001 13:17:41, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Cool. But DBIx::* probably isn't the best place. DBIx:::* is intended
>> >more for modules that add a lay
31/12/2001 13:17:41, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Cool. But DBIx::* probably isn't the best place. DBIx:::* is intended
>more for modules that add a layer of functionality to the DBI API or
>that are similarly _very_ closely tied to it.
>
>It's not really a good place for application-lev
Cool. But DBIx::* probably isn't the best place. DBIx:::* is intended
more for modules that add a layer of functionality to the DBI API or
that are similarly _very_ closely tied to it.
It's not really a good place for application-level functionality.
We also have an SQL::* namespace but that's n
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: DBIx::Normalizer
DSLIP: bdpOg
description: 1st to 2nd normal form DB table converter
userid: GMAX (Giuseppe Maxia)
chapterid:7 (Database_Interfaces)
communities:
http://www.perlmonks.o
