On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:12:57PM -0500, Brendan Fagan wrote:
>
> Yeah, OK, I can live with that.
>
> Since the last email, I've added the following:
>
> $lph->is_first; - true if current record is first record
> $lph->is_last; - true if current record is last record
> and
> $lph->count; - cu
Yeah, OK, I can live with that.
Since the last email, I've added the following:
$lph->is_first; - true if current record is first record
$lph->is_last; - true if current record is last record
and
$lph->count; - current number of the record returned (starting at 1)
Do I need to resubmit for
Yeah, OK, I can live with that.
Since the last email, I've added the following:
$lph->is_first; - true if current record is first record
$lph->is_last; - true if current record is last record
and
$lph->count; - current number of the record returned (starting at 1)
Do I need to resubmit for
Ah, cool, I'd call that 'break handling'.
[It's been on my DBI to-do for years as "Add 'break handling' when
field values change? Use two fbav's so 'previous record' is available.
Define break fields and handlers. Call them via an alternate
fetch_with_break method."]
'Loop' is a bit vague. How a
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules/2001-12/msg00405.html
As I stated earlier, I could stand to elaborate more in the docs, but the
module is relatively straightforward (even if my one line description
needs work).
Hope this will suffice.
- Brendan
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Tim Bunce w
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:17:18AM -0500, Brendan Fagan wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> Thanks for resending the message, but I'm not clear as to why. I did
> already send the docs.
I haven't seen them. Please repost them or a url.
> How about "Supplemental DBI methods for looping, aggregation and
>
Tim,
Thanks for resending the message, but I'm not clear as to why. I did
already send the docs.
How about "Supplemental DBI methods for looping, aggregation and
concatenation of data"?
Happy new year!
- Brendan
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 05:13:32PM
I submitted the docs as requested for DBIx::Loop.
Still wondering why the namespace hasn't been registered.
Do I need to re-request the namespace? Or perhaps sacrifice a lamb in the
name of Larry Wall? :)
Just curious...
I hope the new year finds everyone in good health and good cheer.
Attached are the docs for DBIx::Loop that Tim requested.
I hope this will be sufficient for the my namespace to be registered.
NAME
DBIx::Loop - (some more thought apparently required - suggestions welcome)
SYNOPSIS
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 05:13:32PM +0100, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote:
>
> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
>
> modid: DBIx::Loop
> DSLIP: bdpOg
>
> In following the other DBI extension modules, I choose the DBIx
> rootlevel namesp
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List:
modid: DBIx::Loop
DSLIP: bdpOg
description: Simple Looping routines for DBI
userid: BITS (Brendan Fagan)
chapterid:7 (Database_Interfaces)
communities:
discussed and tested at place of employ
11 matches
Mail list logo