On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:29:46PM -0800 William R Ward wrote:
> I think Mail::Folder is the best name for an application of this
> type. Have you investigated the possibility of taking over
> maintenance of that module? Is your API similar?
Gee, never thought about that yet. The interface is
Tassilo von Parseval writes:
>[ carbon-copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
>
>On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:15:08PM -0800 William R Ward wrote:
>> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
>> that has been posted to perl.modules as well.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tassilo Von Parseval) writes:
>>
[ carbon-copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:15:08PM -0800 William R Ward wrote:
> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to perl.modules as well.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tassilo Von Parseval) writes:
> > could my module Mail::MboxParser b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tassilo Von Parseval) writes:
> could my module Mail::MboxParser be included in the Perl 5 module list?
> Namespace has already been registered and granted quite a while ago.
> Data entered for this module on pause.cpan.org reflect the current state
> of the module. It would bes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tassilo Von Parseval) writes:
> could my module Mail::MboxParser be included in the Perl 5 module list?
> Namespace has already been registered and granted quite a while ago.
> Data entered for this module on pause.cpan.org reflect the current state
> of the module. It would bes
Hi there,
could my module Mail::MboxParser be included in the Perl 5 module list?
Namespace has already been registered and granted quite a while ago.
Data entered for this module on pause.cpan.org reflect the current state
of the module. It would best suit into section 19, "Mail and Usenet
News"
