On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 12:22:37PM -0500, Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> > A TIEHASH interface would make sense.
>
> Perhaps. How would a user specify the callback procedures with a TIEHASH
> interface? Special keys, maybe?
Add args to the tie() call, just like
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Tim Bunce wrote:
> A TIEHASH interface would make sense.
Perhaps. How would a user specify the callback procedures with a TIEHASH
interface? Special keys, maybe?
> p.s. Does IPC::ShareLite work on Win32?
Not that I know of, unless Win32 has a SysV IPC system I don't know
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 04:10:42PM -0500, Sam Tregar wrote:
> Hello again. I'd like to propose a module - IPC::SharedCache. Recently
> I've added a shared memory cache to HTML::Template using IPC::ShareLite
> and Storable. This requires HTML::Template to get pretty down and dirty
> with IPC::Sh
Hello again. I'd like to propose a module - IPC::SharedCache. Recently
I've added a shared memory cache to HTML::Template using IPC::ShareLite
and Storable. This requires HTML::Template to get pretty down and dirty
with IPC::ShareLite and Storable - dealing with allocation and
deallocation of I
