At 22:37 -0600 2000.09.12, Sean M. Burke wrote:
>dist, since the name of the dist has been mentioned so often. So, all
>things being equal, I was actually thinking of putting an all-POD module
>(i.e., providing no functions) in HTML-Tree, called HTML::Tree, that would
I had thought the same thin
At 10:11 PM 2000-09-12 -0400, Chris Nandor wrote:
>[...]
>Sean's (formerly Gisle's) distribution
>uses a name that does not exist in the package itself. I think that is a
>mistake, too. I'd rather the package were called HTML-TreeBuilder, since
>that's the nae of the module. Oh well.
I was jus
At 18:54 -0700 2000.09.12, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
> Unfortunately, there are only a finite number of things one can
> call such a software package.
Yes, but we've not yet reached that finite point.
> Then along comes this e-mail complaining about the name. Ugh.
> I was pe
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Sean M. Burke wrote:
> Someone (CPJL) just uploaded a dist to CPAN called HTML_Tree (in full,
> "HTML_Tree-1.2.3.tar.gz") including a module HTML::Tree. Am I the
> only one who thinks this risks confusion with me and Gisle Aas's
> preexisting HTML-Tree dist?
Unfortu
Someone (CPJL) just uploaded a dist to CPAN called HTML_Tree (in full,
"HTML_Tree-1.2.3.tar.gz") including a module HTML::Tree. Am I the
only one who thinks this risks confusion with me and Gisle Aas's
preexisting HTML-Tree dist?
--
Sean M. Burke[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.spinn.net/~sb
