> On Thu, 25 May 2000 22:45:56 +0100, Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 05:35:58PM -0400, Jay Rogers wrote:
>> > From: Elaine -HFB- Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > There have been several cases recently where someone wanted to tend to a
>> > seemingly orph
> From: Elaine -HFB- Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> There have been several cases recently where someone wanted to tend to a
> seemingly orphaned module but couldn't raise the author. I'm quite certain
> that noone is trying to usurp your module or be rude.
Yes but it appears like that is what h
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 05:35:58PM -0400, Jay Rogers wrote:
> > From: Elaine -HFB- Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > There have been several cases recently where someone wanted to tend to a
> > seemingly orphaned module but couldn't raise the author. I'm quite certain
> > that noone is trying to
Jay Rogers [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>
*>This isn't true. Have you or any of the other addressees, except
*>for Mark, tried to contact me?
*>
*>If you had, then you would have learned that I was planning to
*>upload new release this weekend.
There have been several cases recently where someone
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig)
>
> I'd suggest, we call it commissionary maintenance instead of takeover.
> That way the previous owner can come back within a reasonable
> timeframe and accept or reject changes done by the commissioner.
The considerate thing to do would have been t
> On Thu, 25 May 2000 11:31:22 -0700 (PDT), Ask Bjoern Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> On Thu, 25 May 2000, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
>> There really needs to be a protocol for thisideas?
> the modules@ crowd might have input on that.
I'd suggest, we call it commissionary mainte
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> There really needs to be a protocol for thisideas?
the modules@ crowd might have input on that.
- ask
> - Forwarded message from "Mark A. Hershberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> *>X-Authentication-Warning: hexmode.internal.stanmor
