[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article , "Keefer, Tim"
wrote:
> Anyone know that status of LWP::Parallel? It doesn't support recent
> versions of LWP and I can't get a response from the module author. Is this
> an ab
Anyone know that status of LWP::Parallel? It doesn't support recent
versions of LWP and I can't get a response from the module author. Is this
an abandon module?
Thanks,
-Tim
On 9/1/11 10:18 AM, "Keefer, Tim" wrote:
>Hi -
>
>Is there a version of LWP::Parallel that works with the current versi