Hi Jim,
sorry in the delay in getting back to you.
On 10/02/2012 03:06 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
If the NoSQL moniker continues to gain traction, then DBIx.NoSQL should
probably not even refer to a specific implementation. In response to my
recent post in the Google Groups NoSQL discussion
If the NoSQL moniker continues to gain traction, then DBIx.NoSQL
should probably not even refer to a specific implementation. In response
to my recent post in the Google Groups NoSQL discussion, someone suggested
that DBIx.NoSQL should be reserved as an interface and implementations
named
/
Is there a way to find out if an existing module is still under
development? DBIx.NoSQL seems to still be in Beta and I have been unable
to contact its author. Quite a number of people whom I've talked to have
suggested that DBIx.NoSQL would be the best name, if something can be
