[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article
,
David Golden wrote:
> Unless I hear violent objection (accompanied with a volunteer to take
> over registration responsibilities), this will be my approval policy
> going forw
> PAUSE ID's cost very little to provide. I see no reason to deny
> anyone's application as long as they seem human and mention Perl.
No problem, although I think it would be wise if the approval message
included a short explanation where PAUSE ID's should be used for.
-- Johan
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2013, at 6:45, David Golden wrote:
>> PAUSE ID's cost very little to provide. I see no reason to deny
>> anyone's application as long as they seem human and mention Perl.
>
> They get an email address and a link from the CPAN s
On Apr 9, 2013, at 6:45, David Golden wrote:
> PAUSE ID's cost very little to provide. I see no reason to deny
> anyone's application as long as they seem human and mention Perl.
They get an email address and a link from the CPAN sites and could use both for
spam.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:45:18AM -0400, David Golden wrote:
> Unless I hear violent objection (accompanied with a volunteer to take
> over registration responsibilities), this will be my approval policy
> going forward.
+1
--
Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit
With the improved spam filters in place, I've seen almost no spam
"applications" for quite a while.
The applications I still deny tend to be Perl users applying for a
PAUSE account because they think they need one or just want one,
without saying they intend to upload anything.
Even with my canne
