Re: CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-10 Thread Arthur Corliss
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Philip Newton wrote: > One solution that may or may not apply in your case: upload one more > "version" with the old name whose README and/or Makefile.PL (probably > both) state that "This module has been superseded by New::Module::Name, > which has the same interface. Please u

Re: CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-08 Thread Philip Newton
[Disclaimer: I'm not a CPAN guy.] On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:55:15 -0900 (AKST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur Corliss) wrote: > The biggest quandry I have is a matter of cleaning up: do I risk > breaking existing scripts out there by deleting Parse::PlainConfig > from CPAN? Or do I just funnel all futu

Re: CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-08 Thread Arthur Corliss
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > Thank you, Arthur, for voicing your frustration. We do not have a > bullet proof concept how to avoid frustration, but what happened to > you seems avoidable. :-) Thanks for hearing me out. > Well, at least there it really says: You need *not* wait.

Re: CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-08 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
Thank you, Arthur, for voicing your frustration. We do not have a bullet proof concept how to avoid frustration, but what happened to you seems avoidable. > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:27:07 -0900 (AKST), Arthur Corliss ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Greetings: > Let me start by saying I know yo

CPAN submission guidelines

2003-02-07 Thread Arthur Corliss
Greetings: Let me start by saying I know you guys have day jobs as well, but I have to wonder if I'm following the right procedure on getting modules registered on CPAN. My last couple of attempts appear to be failing miserably. First off, my understanding about namespace registration was to sub