On 22 May 2001, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> but are you sure your registration was?
>
> Your mail was sent Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:06:13 -0600 (CST)
> and Raphael's was sent Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 21:52:26 +0200
>
> Getargs::Long is listed in the Module list since $Revision: 3.64
> $$Date: 2000/
> On Sun, 20 May 2001 23:50:09 -0500 (CDT), Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 21 May 2001, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> But Getargs has one advantage over Params: it pre-existed. Params made
>> up a new rootleval namespace and I wonder what it might be good for
>> that cannot be
On 21 May 2001, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> But Getargs has one advantage over Params: it pre-existed. Params made
> up a new rootleval namespace and I wonder what it might be good for
> that cannot be served by Getargs.
To which I can only reply "huh?"
Getargs:: did not pre-exist. The only mod
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:01:56 -0600 (CST), Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Johan Vromans wrote:
>> That's okay. TIMTOWTDI.
>>
>> Would you settle for Getargs::Validate?
> I find Getargs confusingly similar to Getopts, considering that we often
> refer
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Johan Vromans wrote:
> That's okay. TIMTOWTDI.
>
> Would you settle for Getargs::Validate?
I find Getargs confusingly similar to Getopts, considering that we often
refer to 'command line arguments'. Also, it doesn't actually return the
parameters the way Raphael's module do
[Quoting Dave Rolsky, on March 19 2001, 13:05, in "Re: 2nd request: Par"]
> Good question. I didn't even know Getargs::Long existed. It looks like
> it was released after Params::Validate so that explains how I missed it.
>
> Anyway, having looked at it, I think I'd probably want to continue us
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Sorry for the delay...
>
> [Quoting Dave Rolsky, on March 18 2001, 10:51, in "2nd request: Params:"]
> > Name: Params::Validate
> > DSLI: bdpf
> > Author: DROLSKY
> > Description: Validate subroutine parameters based on type, class, or
> > interface
Sorry for the delay...
[Quoting Dave Rolsky, on March 18 2001, 10:51, in "2nd request: Params:"]
> Name: Params::Validate
> DSLI: bdpf
> Author: DROLSKY
> Description: Validate subroutine parameters based on type, class, or
> interface
Can you indicate the differences between Params::Validat
This got absolutely no comment last time so I'm going to try again. The
04pause.html documents says "Generally a lack of response can be taken as
acceptance of the module name being proposed" but perhaps that's not the
case here because this module still isn't in the index.
Name: Params::Vali
