e: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:33:55 -0700
>
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, bulk 88 wrote:
>>
>> I haven't heard from you since my last post a month ago.
>
> Sorry, I didn't have time to look at this in details. My gut
> feeling is that API hooking should be in a separate
> To: bul...@hotmail.com
> CC: libwi...@perl.org; modules@perl.org
> Subject: Re: "Win32::API::Callback::IATPatch" name for DLL/SO hooker for
> Win32::API
> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:25:31 +0200
> From: cos...@streppone.it
>
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:12:5
> From: bul...@hotmail.com
> To: cos...@streppone.it; libwi...@perl.org; j...@activestate.com
> Subject: RE: "Win32::API::Callback::IATPatch" name for DLL/SO hooker for
> Win32::API
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:48:34 -0400
>
>
>
>
> > To: libwi...@perl.or
Wanted ONLY Serious***Wholesalers! Distributors! Importers!
Exporters!To carry our exclusive
Multifunction Newly Invented Quality Products:
Auto-Toilet, D-I-Y
Kitchen, Laundry and B
