Matthew Sachs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, perhaps some sort of consolidation is in order. I propose
> that a new second-level hierarchy be created, Net::IM. Some consensus
> between the us would be reached as to the interface to this module,
> and maybe some other details such as style
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> That seems reasonable. Unless anyone objects, that's what I'll use.
After further considering it, I don't think I like putting it in
HTTP::. While the mechanism by which it operates uses HTTP, the scope
of possible applications is more general an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Andreas J. Koenig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HTTP::Tunnel ?
That seems reasonable. Unless anyone objects, that's what I'll use.
- --
Riad Wahby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIT VI-2/A 2002
5105
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Lin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Net::ConnectTunnel seems a bit clumsy, but I can't really think of
anything better. Net::Tunnel would cover too much, as it's not a
general tunnelling module. Eventually, I'd like to extend the module
to include other ways of tunnelling through HTTP
