Re: Module submission Data::RRDs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Duncan McGreggor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey guys, I heard back from the author... >> >> What he wants to do for now is use the following: >> >> Data::RRD::SharedModule >&

Re: Module submission Data::RRDs

e reason for it to be two modules is, that the piped module works even when you do not manage to compile the shared perl object ... having both in one is sort of pointless ... as for the name, this is fine ... we can have a 3 part name ... cheers tobi Duncan McGreggor writes: >I will talk this

Re: Module submission Data::RRDp

I just forwarded you the other mail they sent as well. What do you think about their suggestion? I was wondering something similar myself when I submitted these, but I thought that such a think could happen later. Perhaps sooner is better? duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In article <[EMAIL PR

Re: Module submission Data::RRDs

I will talk this over with the author and see what he has to say - thanks for your help and input! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Perl Authors >Upload Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: >> >> mod

request to register on CPAN

Name: Duncan McGreggor Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Www: NA Preferred CPAN user-ID: OUBIWANN Short description: I have written a content management system in perl that requires little or no resources from a user's ISP. It uses DBI and a csv database. This seems to be something that many out