Re: RFC: Acme::Inline?

>why not just name it Inline::Brainfuck? my Inline::TT >(Template-Toolkit) is also a scary module, but it doesn't have Acme:: >namespace ;) I'll give it some thought. I do think it really belongs in Acme though. >Well, I've found Inline::Brainfuck on inline list archives also ... >http:[EMAIL

RFC: Acme::Inline?

seeking feedback on whether this is a good approach or not before I submit my two modules. -- Dean Povey, |em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|JCSI: Java security toolkit Wedgetail Communications|ph: +61 7 3023 5139 |uPKI: Embedded/C PKI toolkit Level 14, 388 Queen St, |fax: +61 7 3023 5199 |

Registering as a developer

I'd like to register as a developer, here are my details. Name: Dean Povey Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Preferred User-ID: dean or povey Description of what I'm planning to contribute: - an Acme module that implements the Brainfuck language http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf in