RE: Top Level Namespace "Ginger"

2015-11-29 Thread David Helkowski
Neil,Thank you for clarifying this. I will create a core Ginger.pm for this purpose and include it. Really it should be there anyway in order to describe the purpose and arrangement of the 'Ginger' namespace.I assume that I can still release other deeper modules in the same package, ( Ginger::Refer

RE: Module submission Framework::Core

2013-05-20 Thread David Helkowski
naming convention can be reached. For ease of reference, I have quoted the relevant original emails below. > Original Message > Subject: Re: Module submission Framework::Core > From: Matt S Trout > Date: Wed, May 01, 2013 3:43 pm > To: David Helkowski > Cc

RE: Module submission Framework::Core

2013-05-01 Thread David Helkowski
From: Matt S Trout <m...@shadowcat.co.uk> Date: Wed, May 01, 2013 1:48 pm To: David Helkowski <codech...@cpan.org> Cc: modules@perl.org, brian d foy <brian.d@gmail.com> This module is clearly going to sprawl over time, so I would prefer you gave it a top-level name in the

RE: Module submission Framework::Core

2013-05-01 Thread David Helkowski
54a1f...@pause.perl.org>, "Perl Authors Upload Server" <upl...@pause.perl.org> wrote: > modid: Framework::Core > DSLIP: adpOp > description: Modular application framework > userid: CODECHILD (David Helkowski) > Uniqueness: The approach taken by Fr